ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2020
Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis Part 2: deep endometriosis †‡¶.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Diagnostics and Surgical Treatment of Deep Endometriosis-Real-World Data from a Large Endometriosis Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Fluorescence guidance during robotic resection of bladder wall endometriosis: case report and technique.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Exploring Patient Adherence to Post-Surgical Follow-Up in Pelvic Endometriosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Transvaginal sonography and surgical findings in the diagnosis of endometriosis individuals: A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Article
- Improved quality of life (EHP-30) in patients with endometriosis after surgical treatment.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Observational
- Endometriosis classification/staging and terminology- Are we getting closer to finding a universally accepted language?Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- An International Terminology for Endometriosis, 2021.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Preoperative imaging of deep endometriosis: pitfalls of a diagnostic test before surgery.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021Human reproduction open · 2021Article
- Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classificationHuman reproduction open · 2021Article
- Bowel anastomosis leakage following endometriosis surgery: an evidence based analysis of risk factors and prevention techniques.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2020Review
- A European survey on the conservative surgical management of endometriotic cysts on behalf of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) Special Interest Group (SIG) on Endometriosis.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2020Article
- Credit Where Credit's Due: Gynecology Paves the Way for MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery).JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionHow should surgery for endometriosis be performed? SUMMARY ANSWER: This document provides recommendations covering technical aspects of different methods of surgery for deep endometriosis in women of reproductive age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Endometriosis is highly prevalent and often associated with severe symptoms. Yet compared to equally prevalent conditions it is poorly understood and a challenge to manage. Previously published guidelines have provided recommendations for (surgical) treatment of deep endometriosis, based on the best available evidence, but without technical information and details on how to best perform such treatment in order to be effective and safe. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A working group of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the World Endometriosis Society (WES) collaborated on writing recommendations on the practical aspects of surgery for treatment of deep endometriosis. PARTICIPANTS MATERIALS SETTING
methodsThis document focused on surgery for deep endometriosis, and is complementary to a previous document in this series focusing on endometrioma surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The document presents general recommendations for surgery for deep endometriosis, starting from preoperative assessments and first steps of surgery. Different approaches for surgical treatment are discussed and are respective of location and extent of disease; uterosacral ligaments and rectovaginal septum with or without involvement of the rectum, urinary tract or extrapelvic endometriosis. In addition, recommendations are provided on the treatment of frozen pelvis and on hysterectomy as a treatment for deep endometriosis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to the limited evidence available, recommendations are mostly based on clinical expertise. Where available, references of relevant studies were added. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThese recommendations complement previous guidelines on management of endometriosis and the recommendations for surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma. STUDY FUNDING - COMPETING INTERESTS: The meetings of the working group were funded by ESGE, ESHRE and WES.Dr. Roman reports personal fees from ETHICON, PLASMASURGICAL, OLYMPUS, and NORDIC PHARMA, outside the submitted work; Dr. Becker reports grants from Bayer AG, Volition Rx, MDNA Life Sciences, and Roche Diagnostics Inc, and other relationships or activities from AbbVie Inc, and Myriad Inc, during the conduct of the study; Dr. Tomassetti reports non-financial support from ESHRE, during the conduct of the study; non-financial support and other from Lumenis, Gedeon-Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Merck SA, outside the submitted work. The other authors had nothing to disclose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32322824PMC7162667W3027774259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.