ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2020
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fastidious or rarely isolated gram-negative rods with a particular focus onClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Vitreous Hemorrhage Following Blunt Ocular Trauma by a Cat's Forepaw: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Fulminant endophthalmitis after open globe injury by cat claw: two case reports and literature review.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Article
- Ocular Bacterial Infections: A Ten-Year Survey and Review of Causative Organisms Based on the Oklahoma Experience.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- Pasteurella Multocida Panophthalmitis: A Devastating Sequela of an Industrial Penetrating Injury.Cureus · 2022Article
- Cat Inflicted Eye Injury in a Child.Journal of medical cases · 2021Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in 314 Japanese Patients with Bacterial Endophthalmitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study from J-CREST.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the case of a Japanese girl with a perforating ocular injury caused by a cat scratch, resulting in Pasteurella multocida-induced endophthalmitis. OBSERVATIONS: A 10-year-old girl presented with a red eye, eye pain, and blurred vision in her right eye immediately after receiving a cat scratch. We performed lensectomy and vitrectomy for endophthalmitis 4 hours after her arrival. After culturing a sample of the vitreous humor, Pasteurella multocida was identified, and the antibiotic was changed to ampicillin. The best-corrected visual acuity of her right eye improved to 20/20 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: We present a rare case of Pasteurella multocida-induced endophthalmitis after a cat scratch. Our findings suggest the great importance of identifying the responsible bacterium and using matched antibiotics as soon as possible in such cases to prevent vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.