Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32322563›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Sharing the Ride:

Philip E Stewart, Marshall E Bloom

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Coinfection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Key molecules regulating the blood meals ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Isolation of Culturable Bacteria inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Grappling with the tick microbiome.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip E StewartBiology of Vector-Borne Viruses Section, Laboratory of Virology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, United States.
Marshall E BloomBiology of Vector-Borne Viruses Section, Laboratory of Virology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, United States.

Funding

Pathogenesis of Tick-Borne Flavivirus InfectionsZIAAI000940 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI BLOOM, MARSHALL ELLIOTT · 2009 to 2025
$19.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deer tick

Indexed as

BabesiosisBorrelia burgdorferiIxodesLyme DiseaseMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaUnited StatesBabesiaBorrelia burgdorferideer tick virusEhrlichiamicrobiomeRickettsia

Identifiers

PMID32322563
PMCPMC7156593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.