ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
RF-MaloSite and DL-Malosite: Methods based on random forest and deep learning to identify malonylation sites.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current computational tools for protein lysine acylation site prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Lactylation in Cardiovascular Diseases: Current Progress and Perspectives.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Systematic qualitative proteome-wide analysis of lysine malonylation profiling in Platycodon grandiflorus.Amino acids · 2025Article
- Post-translational modification prediction via prompt-based fine-tuning of a GPT-2 model.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Analysis and review of techniques and tools based on machine learning and deep learning for prediction of lysine malonylation sites in protein sequences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Review
- Advances, obstacles, and opportunities for machine learning in proteomics.Cell reports. Physical science · 2022Article
- A hybrid feature extraction scheme for efficient malonylation site prediction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Deep Learning-Based Advances In Protein Posttranslational Modification Site and Protein Cleavage Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Bioinformatic Analyses of Peroxiredoxins and RF-Prx: A Random Forest-Based Predictor and Classifier for Prxs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- A deep learning based approach for prediction of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii phosphorylation sites.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- DTL-DephosSite: Deep Transfer Learning Based Approach to Predict Dephosphorylation Sites.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Accurately Predicting Glutarylation Sites Using Sequential Bi-Peptide-Based Evolutionary Features.Genes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malonylation, which has recently emerged as an important lysine modification, regulates diverse biological activities and has been implicated in several pervasive disorders, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. However, conventional global proteomics analysis using tandem mass spectrometry can be time-consuming, expensive and technically challenging. Therefore, to complement and extend existing experimental methods for malonylation site identification, we developed two novel computational methods for malonylation site prediction based on random forest and deep learning machine learning algorithms, RF-MaloSite and DL-MaloSite, respectively. DL-MaloSite requires the primary amino acid sequence as an input and RF-MaloSite utilizes a diverse set of biochemical, physiochemical and sequence-based features. While systematic assessment of performance metrics suggests that both 'RF-MaloSite' and 'DL-MaloSite' perform well in all metrics tested, our methods perform particularly well in the areas of accuracy, sensitivity and overall method performance (assessed by the Matthew's Correlation Coefficient). For instance, RF-MaloSite exhibited MCC scores of 0.42 and 0.40 using 10-fold cross-validation and an independent test set, respectively. Meanwhile, DL-MaloSite was characterized by MCC scores of 0.51 and 0.49 based on 10-fold cross-validation and an independent set, respectively. Importantly, both methods exhibited efficiency scores that were on par or better than those achieved by existing malonylation site prediction methods. The identification of these sites may also provide important insights into the mechanisms of crosstalk between malonylation and other lysine modifications, such as acetylation, glutarylation and succinylation. To facilitate their use, both methods have been made freely available to the research community at https://github.com/dukkakc/DL-MaloSite-and-RF-MaloSite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.