Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32322367›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

RF-MaloSite and DL-Malosite: Methods based on random forest and deep learning to identify malonylation sites.

Hussam Al-Barakati, Niraj Thapa, Saigo Hiroto, Kaushik Roy, Robert H Newman, Dukka Kc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hussam Al-BarakatiDepartment of computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Niraj ThapaDepartment of computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Saigo HirotoFaculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kaushik RoyDepartment of computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Robert H NewmanDepartment of Biology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Dukka KcDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA.

Funding

Biochemical and Cellular Analysis of Redox Modification on Protein Kinase Substrate SelectionSC1GM130545 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA AGRI & TECH ST UNIV · PI NEWMAN, ROBERT HOWARD · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS SC1 GM130545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malonylation, which has recently emerged as an important lysine modification, regulates diverse biological activities and has been implicated in several pervasive disorders, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. However, conventional global proteomics analysis using tandem mass spectrometry can be time-consuming, expensive and technically challenging. Therefore, to complement and extend existing experimental methods for malonylation site identification, we developed two novel computational methods for malonylation site prediction based on random forest and deep learning machine learning algorithms, RF-MaloSite and DL-MaloSite, respectively. DL-MaloSite requires the primary amino acid sequence as an input and RF-MaloSite utilizes a diverse set of biochemical, physiochemical and sequence-based features. While systematic assessment of performance metrics suggests that both 'RF-MaloSite' and 'DL-MaloSite' perform well in all metrics tested, our methods perform particularly well in the areas of accuracy, sensitivity and overall method performance (assessed by the Matthew's Correlation Coefficient). For instance, RF-MaloSite exhibited MCC scores of 0.42 and 0.40 using 10-fold cross-validation and an independent test set, respectively. Meanwhile, DL-MaloSite was characterized by MCC scores of 0.51 and 0.49 based on 10-fold cross-validation and an independent set, respectively. Importantly, both methods exhibited efficiency scores that were on par or better than those achieved by existing malonylation site prediction methods. The identification of these sites may also provide important insights into the mechanisms of crosstalk between malonylation and other lysine modifications, such as acetylation, glutarylation and succinylation. To facilitate their use, both methods have been made freely available to the research community at https://github.com/dukkakc/DL-MaloSite-and-RF-MaloSite.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkDeep learningMalonylationPost-translational Modification SitesRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID32322367
PMCPMC7160427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.