Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32322314›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2020

Effect of Polyarginine Peptide R18D Following a Traumatic Brain Injury in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Li Shan Chiu, Ryan S Anderton, Vince W Clark, Jane L Cross, Neville W Knuckey, Bruno P Meloni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li Shan ChiuPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Ryan S AndertonPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Vince W ClarkPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Jane L CrossPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Neville W KnuckeyPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Bruno P MeloniPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite extensive studies, there are still no clinically available neuroprotective treatments for traumatic brain injury.

objectivesIn previous studies we demonstrated beneficial treatment effects of polyarginine peptides R18 (18-mer of arginine; 300 nmol/kg) and R18D (18-mer of D-arginine; 1000 nmol/kg) in a rat model of impact-acceleration closed-head injury.

methodsWe examined the efficacy of R18D when intravenously administered at a low (100 nmol/kg) and high (1000 nmol/kg) dose, 30 minutes after a closed-head injury in male Sprague-Dawley rats.

resultsAt postinjury day 3, treatment with R18D at the high dose significantly reduced axonal injury (

conclusionsR18D modestly decreased axonal injury only at the highest dose used but had no significant effect on functional recovery. These findings warrant further studies with additional doses to better understand peptide pharmacodynamics and provide information to guide optimal dosing.

Indexed as

Cationic arginine-rich peptidesDiffuse axonal injuryNeuroprotectionR18DTBI

Identifiers

PMID32322314
PMCPMC7163064
OpenAlexW3011752851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.