Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32322311›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2018

Current Status of Research Ethics Capacity in Myanmar.

Zaw-Zaw Oo, Yin-Thet-Nu Oo, Mo-Mo Than, Khine Zaw Oo, Min Wun, Kyaw-Soe Htun, Henry Silverman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zaw-Zaw OoUniversity of Medicine 2, Yangon, Yangon, Myanmar.
Yin-Thet-Nu OoDepartment of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar.
Mo-Mo ThanDefence Services Medical Academy, Yangon, Myanmar.
Khine Zaw OoDefence Services Medical Research Center, Ministry of Defence, Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Min WunDepartment of Food and Drug Administration, Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Kyaw-Soe HtunDefence Services Medical Research Center, Ministry of Defence, Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Henry SilvermanUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 S. Paca Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-4328

Funding

Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative (MERETI)R25TW007090 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BRAIR, SARA LAVINIA FATAH EL RAHMAN, SILVERMAN, HENRY J · 2004 to 2020
$4.1M
Developing a Master's Degree Program in Research Ethics in MyanmarR25TW010516 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LOFF, BEBE, MYINT, THEINGI · 2017 to 2021
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW007090FIC NIH HHS R25 TW010516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myanmar has recently surfaced from total military rule and efforts at conducting research to enhance the health of the population has increased during the recent democratization process, both from the military and civil sectors as well as support from international agencies. International guidelines mandate that such research requires prior ethics review in accordance with international standards. Previous commentators have expressed concerns, however, regarding the degree of adequate training in research ethics for investigators, the optimal functioning of Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and the extent of responsible conduct in research in low and middle-income countries. Such concerns might also be applicable to Myanmar, especially since it has recently emerged from a long period of military rule where there has been lack of basic freedoms and human rights abuses. We herein review the current gaps in research ethics capacity in Myanmar, the status of the existing RECs and the current efforts to establish training programs to enhance capacity in research ethics.

Indexed as

MyanmarResearchResearch ethicsResearch ethics committees

Identifiers

PMID32322311
PMCPMC7175963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.