Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32322091›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Computer-aided synthesis of dapsone-phytochemical conjugates against dapsone-resistant Mycobacterium leprae.

Shasank S Swain, Sudhir K Paidesetty, Budheswar Dehury, Madhusmita Das, Sundeep C Vedithi, Rabindra N Padhy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anti-proliferative Activity ofCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Shasank S SwainCentral Research Laboratory, Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Kalinga Nagar, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India. swain.shasanksekhar86@gmail.com.
Sudhir K PaidesettyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India. sairampaidesetty@gmail.com.
Budheswar DehuryICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, 751023, Odisha, India.
Madhusmita DasSchieffelin Institute of Health-Research and Leprosy Centre, Karigiri, 632106, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sundeep C VedithiSchieffelin Institute of Health-Research and Leprosy Centre, Karigiri, 632106, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rabindra N PadhyCentral Research Laboratory, Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Kalinga Nagar, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India. rnpadhy54@gmail.com.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INSchieffelin Institute of Health Research and Leprosy Centre · INSiksha O Anusandhan University · INTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy continues to be the belligerent public health hazard for the causation of high disability and eventual morbidity cases with stable prevalence rates, even with treatment by the on-going multidrug therapy (MDT). Today, dapsone (DDS) resistance has led to fear of leprosy in more unfortunate people of certain developing countries. Herein, DDS was chemically conjugated with five phytochemicals independently as dapsone-phytochemical conjugates (DPCs) based on azo-coupling reaction. Possible biological activities were verified with computational chemistry and quantum mechanics by molecular dynamics simulation program before chemical synthesis and spectral characterizations viz., proton-HNMR, FTIR, UV and LC-MS. The in vivo antileprosy activity was monitored using the 'mouse-foot-pad propagation method', with WHO recommended concentration 0.01% mg/kg each DPC for 12 weeks, and the host-toxicity testing of the active DPC4 was seen in cultured-human-lymphocytes in vitro. One-log bacilli cells in DDS-resistant infected mice footpads decreased by the DPC4, and no bacilli were found in the DDS-sensitive mice hind pads. Additionally, the in vitro host toxicity study also confirmed that the DCP4 up to 5,000 mg/L level was safety for oral administration, since a minor number of dead cells were found in red color under a fluorescent microscope. Several advanced bioinformatics tools could help locate the potential chemical entity, thereby reducing the time and resources required for in vitro and in vitro tests. DPC4 could be used in place of DDS in MDT, evidenced from in vivo antileprosy activity and in vitro host toxicity study.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDapsoneLeprostatic AgentsPhytochemicalsHumansLeprosyMycobacterium lepraeDapsoneLeprostatic AgentsPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID32322091
PMCPMC7176699
OpenAlexW3019322471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.