Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32321995›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Modelling human CNS injury with human neural stem cells in 2- and 3-Dimensional cultures.

Barbora Vagaska, Olivia Gillham, Patrizia Ferretti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. InOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Plant Cellulose as a Substrate for 3D Neural Stem Cell Culture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Luminescent Human iPSC-Derived Neurospheroids Enable Modeling of Neurotoxicity After Oxygen-glucose Deprivation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbora Vagaska *Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Olivia Gillham *Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Patrizia FerrettiStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. p.ferretti@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-6772
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult human central nervous system (CNS) has very limited regenerative capability, and injury at the cellular and molecular level cannot be studied in vivo. Modelling neural damage in human systems is crucial to identifying species-specific responses to injury and potentially neurotoxic compounds leading to development of more effective neuroprotective agents. Hence we developed human neural stem cell (hNSC) 3-dimensional (3D) cultures and tested their potential for modelling neural insults, including hypoxic-ischaemic and Ca

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCentral Nervous SystemEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGlucoseHumansNeural Stem CellsNeuroblastomaNeuronsOxygenThapsigarginGlucoseOxygenThapsigargin

Identifiers

PMID32321995
PMCPMC7176653
OpenAlexW3020270984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.