Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32321887›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2020

Exposures during wet production and use processes of nanomaterials: a summary of 11 worksite evaluations.

Eric Glassford, Nicole M Neu-Baker, Kevin L Dunn, Kevin H Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric GlassfordNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA.
Nicole M Neu-BakerNanobioscience Constellation, College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering, State University of New York (SUNY) Polytechnic Institute, USA.
Kevin L DunnNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA.
Kevin H DunnNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2011-2015, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanotechnology Field Studies Team conducted 11 evaluations at worksites that either produced engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) via a wet process or used ENMs in a wetted, suspended, or slurry form. Wet handling or processing of ENMs reduces potential exposure compared to dry handling or processing; however, air sampling data indicated exposures may still occur. Information was gathered about each company, production processes, ENMs of interest, and control measures. Exposure assessments included air sampling using filter media, surface wipe sampling, and real-time particle counting by direct-reading instruments. Electron microscopy analysis of air filters confirmed the presence of ENMs of interest (10 of 11 sites). When a method was available, chemical analysis of filters was also used to detect the presence of ENMs (nine of 11 sites). Wipe samples were collected at four of the 11 sites, and, in each case, confirmed the presence of ENMs on surfaces. Direct-reading data showed potential nanomaterial emissions (nine of 11 sites). Engineering controls included fume hoods, cleanrooms, and enclosed processes. Personal protective equipment was required during all 11 evaluations. Recommendations to address potential exposures were provided to each company following the hierarchy of controls.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalEnvironmental MonitoringMicroscopy, ElectronNanostructuresNanotechnologyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Occupational ExposureParticulate MatterPersonal Protective EquipmentUnited StatesAir Pollutants, OccupationalParticulate MatterDirect-reading instrumentsElectron microscopyExposure assessmentIndustrial hygieneNanotechnologyWork environments

Identifiers

PMID32321887
PMCPMC7557413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.