Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32321595›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2020

Extending the vulnerability-stress model of mental disorders: three-dimensional

Miriam A Schiele, Katharina Herzog, Leonie Kollert, Christoph Schartner, Elisabeth J Leehr, Joscha Böhnlein, Jonathan Repple, Karoline Rosenkranz, Tina B Lonsdorf, Udo Dannlowski and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Acute stress induces changes in epigenome-wide DNA methylation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on stress resilience and mental health: A critical review across waves.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. A CommonGenes · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Prevention in psychiatry: a role for epigenetics?World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam A SchieleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2613-6515
Katharina HerzogDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), and Center of Mental Health, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany.
Leonie KollertDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Christoph SchartnerDepartment of Physiology University of California San Francisco, USA; and Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-3956
Elisabeth J LeehrDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany.
Joscha BöhnleinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany.
Jonathan ReppleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany.
Karoline RosenkranzInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Tina B LonsdorfInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Udo DannlowskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany.
Peter Zwanzgerkbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum; and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
Paul PauliDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy) and Center of Mental Health, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany.
Jürgen DeckertDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina DomschkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, and Center for Basics in Neuromodulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2550-9132
University of Münster · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInn-Salzach-Klinikum · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe general understanding of the 'vulnerability-stress model' of mental disorders neglects the modifying impact of resilience-increasing factors such as coping ability.

aimsProbing a conceptual framework integrating both adverse events and coping factors in an extended 'vulnerability-stress-coping model' of mental disorders, the effects of functional neuropeptide S receptor gene (NPSR1) variation (G), early adversity (E) and coping factors (C) on anxiety were addressed in a three-dimensional G × E × C model.

methodIn two independent samples of healthy probands (discovery: n = 1403; replication: n = 630), the interaction of NPSR1 rs324981, childhood trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CTQ) and general self-efficacy as a measure of coping ability (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE) on trait anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) was investigated via hierarchical multiple regression analyses.

resultsIn both samples, trait anxiety differed as a function of NPSR1 genotype, CTQ and GSE score (discovery: β = 0.129, P = 3.938 × 10-8; replication: β = 0.102, P = 0.020). In A allele carriers, the relationship between childhood trauma and anxiety was moderated by general self-efficacy: higher self-efficacy and childhood trauma resulted in low anxiety scores, and lower self-efficacy and childhood trauma in higher anxiety levels. In turn, TT homozygotes displayed increased anxiety as a function of childhood adversity unaffected by general self-efficacy.

conclusionsFunctional NPSR1 variation and childhood trauma are suggested as prime moderators in the vulnerability-stress model of anxiety, further modified by the protective effect of self-efficacy. This G × E × C approach - introducing coping as an additional dimension further shaping a G × E risk constellation, thus suggesting a three-dimensional 'vulnerability-stress-coping model' of mental disorders - might inform targeted preventive or therapeutic interventions strengthening coping ability to promote resilient functioning.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalGene-Environment InteractionAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSelf EfficacyNPSR1 protein, humanReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledanxiety disorderdifferential susceptibilitygeneral self-efficacyneuropeptide S receptorResilience

Identifiers

PMID32321595
PMCPMC7589989
OpenAlexW3020088281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.