Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32321500›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Contact characteristics and factors associated with the degree of urgency among older people in emergency primary health care: a cross-sectional study.

Lisa Marie Haraldseide, Linn Solveig Sortland, Steinar Hunskaar, Tone Morken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. General practice consultation patterns and patient factors predicting older patients' use of out-of-hours services: a nationwide register-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa Marie HaraldseideNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, NO-5018, Bergen, Norway. liha@norceresearch.no.
Linn Solveig SortlandNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, NO-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Steinar HunskaarNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, NO-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Tone MorkenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, NO-5018, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the proportion of older people increases, so will the consumption of health services. The aim of this study was to describe the contact characteristics among older people and to identify factors associated with the degree of urgency at the Norwegian out-of-hours (OOH) emergency primary health care services.

methodsInhabitants aged ≥70 years who contacted the OOH service during 2014-2017 in seven OOH districts in Norway were included. We investigated the variables sex, age, time of contact, mode of contact, ICPC-2 based reason for encounter (RFE), priority degree and initial response. We also performed frequency analyses, rate calculations and a log-binomial regression.

resultsA total of 38,293 contacts were registered. The contact rate/1000 inhabitants/year was three times higher in the oldest age group (≥90 years) compared to the youngest age group (70-74 years). Direct attendance accounted for 8.4% of the contacts and 32.8% were telephone contacts from health professionals. The most frequent RFE chapter used was "A General and unspecified" (21.0%) which also showed an increasing rate with higher age. 6.0% of the contacts resulted in a home visit from a doctor. Variables significantly associated with urgent priority degree were RFEs regarding cardiovascular (Relative risk (RR) 1.85; CI 1.74-1.96), neurological (RR 1.55; CI 1.36-1.77), respiratory (RR 1.40; CI 1.30-1.51) and digestive (RR 1.22; CI 1.10-1.34) issues. In addition, telephone calls from health professionals (RR 1.21; CI 1.12-1.31), direct attendance (RR 1.13; CI 1.04-1.22), contacts on weekdays (RR 1.13; CI 1.06-1.20) and contacts from men (RR 1.13; CI 1.09-1.17) were significantly associated with urgent priority degree.

conclusionsThis study provides important information about the Norwegian older inhabitants' contact with the OOH emergency primary health care services. There are a wide variety of RFEs, and the contact rate is high and increases with higher age. Telephone contact is most common. The OOH staff frequently identify older people as having "general and unspecified" reasons for encounters. OOH nursing staff would benefit from having screening tools and enhanced geriatric training to best support this vulnerable group when these individuals call the OOH service.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareEmergency Service, HospitalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHouse CallsHumansMaleNorwayAgedEmergency medical service (EMS)International classification of primary care (ICPC)NorwayOlder peopleOut-of-hoursPrehospitalPrimary health careReason for encounterTriage

Identifiers

PMID32321500
PMCPMC7178956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.