ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2020
To measure T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- UTE MRI technical developments and applications in osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Gold nanoparticles conjugated with epidermal growth factor and gadolinium for precision delivery of contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- A short-TR single-echo spin-echo breath-hold method for assessing liver T2.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- T1ρ and T2* Measurements in Small and Knee-Sized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms: Effect of Phantom Size and Position Relative to Isocenter.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2023Article
- Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: Met and Unmet Needs in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Review
- Probing immune infiltration dynamics in cancer by in vivo imaging.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2022Review
- Fast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate the feasibility of a new method for measuring T
methodsT
resultsThe proposed 3D IR-UTE-Cones method provided higher contrast images of short T
conclusionThe 3D IR-UTE-Cones sequence could accurately measure short T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.