Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32320896›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2020

Long-Term Financial, Psychosocial, and Overall Health-Related Quality of Life After Living Liver Donation.

Muhammad H Raza, Michelle H Kim, Li Ding, Tse-Ling Fong, Christian Romero, Yuri Genyk, Linda Sher, Juliet Emamaullee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Financial toxicity in living donor liver transplantation: A call to action for financial neutrality.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of long-term outcomes post living liver donation highlights the importance of scientific integrity when presenting transplant registry data.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Health-related quality of life after anonymous nondirected living liver donation: A multicenter collaboration.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  13. [Living related liver transplantation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad H RazaKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Michelle H KimKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Li DingDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Tse-Ling FongKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Christian RomeroDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Yuri GenykKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Linda SherKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Juliet EmamaulleeKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: Juliet.emamaullee@med.usc.edu.

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
Structural and Functional Studies of the Uterine LymphaticsR01HL141857 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Young-Kwon Hong · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the impact of living liver donation (LD) in a diverse and aging population up to 20 y after donation, particularly with regard to medical, financial, psychosocial, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

methodsPatients undergoing LD between 1999 and 2009 were recruited to respond to the Short-Form 36 and a novel Donor Quality of Life Survey at two time points (2010 and 2018).

resultsSixty-eight living liver donors (LLDs) completed validated surveys, with a mean follow-up of 11.5 ± 5.1 y. Per Donor Quality of Life Survey data, physical activity or strength was not impacted by LD in most patients. All respondents returned to school or employment, and 82.4% reported that LD had no impact on school or work performance. LD did not impact health insurability in 95.6% of donors, and only one patient experienced difficulty obtaining life insurance. Overall, 97.1% of respondents did not regret LD. Short-Form 36 survey-measured outcomes were similar between LLDs and the general U.S. POPULATION: LLDs who responded in both 2010 and 2018 were followed for an overall average of 15.4 ± 2.4 y and HRQOL outcomes in these donors also remained statistically equivalent to U.S. population norms.

conclusionsThis study represents the longest postdonation follow-up and offers unique insight related to HRQOL in a highly diverse patient population. Although LLDs continue to maintain excellent HRQOL outcomes up to 20 y after donation, continued lifetime follow-up is required to accurately provide young, healthy potential donors with an accurate description of the risks that they may incur on aging.

Indexed as

EmotionsQuality of LifeTissue and Organ ProcurementAdolescentAdultEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansInsurance CoverageLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesLiving donor liver transplantationliving liver donationQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32320896
PMCPMC8351216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.