ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Chromatin Viscoelasticity Measured by Local Dynamic Analysis.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromatin remodelling: a driving force in reverse mechanotransduction.RNA biology · 2026Review
- Centromeres and telomeres as rheological probes of the human cell nucleus.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Increased Telomere Mobility in Progeria is Restored by Isoprenylcysteine Carboxyl Methyltransferase Inhibition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Fluid Mosaic Model of chromatin organization: integrating dynamics, conformational heterogeneity and multiscale organization.Communications biology · 2026Review
- From chromosomal protein disorder to chromatin phase separation.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Review
- Tuning nuclear rheology through transient chromatin cross-links.Physical review. E · 2025Article
- Differential regulation of mesoscale chromosome conformations in osteoblasts and osteosarcoma.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Viscoelastic differences between isolated and live MCF7 cancer cell nuclei resolved with AFM microrheology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Interplay of condensate material properties and chromatin heterogeneity governs nuclear condensate ripening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional genome architecture persists in a 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth skin sample.Cell · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Single-chromosome dynamics reveals locus-dependent dynamics and chromosome territory orientation.Journal of cell science · 2023Article
- Probing local chromatin dynamics by tracking telomeres.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Nuclear size rectification: A potential new therapeutic approach to reduce metastasis in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- The solid and liquid states of chromatin.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Review
- Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneity.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- The Dynamics of Lamin a During the Cell Cycle.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: dynamic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The nucleus in eukaryotic cells is a crowded environment that consists of genetic code along the DNA, together with a condensed solution of proteins, RNA, and other molecules. It is subjected to highly dynamic processes, including cell division, transcription, and DNA repair. In addition, the genome in the nucleus is subjected to external forces applied by the cytoplasmic skeleton and neighboring cells, as well as to internal nuclear forces. These forces oppose the need to maintain the genome order, which may be compensated by the internal nuclear viscoelastic properties that can restrain these forces. The structural and mechanical properties of chromatin inside the nucleus are still not fully clear; however, their importance for the proper functioning of the cells is unquestionable. Different approaches have been developed for this aim, ranging from directly measuring the dynamic and elastic properties of chromatin to studying the interactions of chromatin with the surrounding envelope and nuclear bodies. Although the elasticity of naked DNA in vitro is well characterized, the elasticity of chromatin in live cells is more complex and is still not fully understood. Here, we studied the elastic properties of chromatin by dynamic measurements in live cells, followed by viscoelastic modeling. We measured the trajectories of single chromatin loci, centromeres, and telomeres in live cells and analyzed their dynamics using the Langevin formalism. We assumed that the overall effect of the chromatin network forces can be modeled for each locus by a local harmonic potential and calculated the effective force constant. In addition, we assumed that this harmonic force results from the chromatin network formed by the internal polymer structure together with cross-links formed by the protein complex. We show that lamin A has the greatest effect on chromatin viscoelasticity and that its removal leads to a significant reduction in the local harmonic force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.