Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32320423›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Progress towards a representative network of Southern Ocean protected areas.

Cassandra M Brooks, Steven L Chown, Lucinda L Douglass, Ben P Raymond, Justine D Shaw, Zephyr T Sylvester, Christa L Torrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The time is right for an Antarctic biorepository network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Consensus decision-making in CCAMLR: Achilles' heel or fundamental to its success?International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cassandra M BrooksEnvironmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1397-0394
Steven L ChownSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lucinda L DouglassCentre for Conservation Geography, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ben P RaymondAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
Justine D ShawCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Zephyr T SylvesterEnvironmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-3741
Christa L TorrensEnvironmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-7645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global threats to ocean biodiversity have generated a worldwide movement to take actions to improve conservation and management. Several international initiatives have recommended the adoption of marine protected areas (MPAs) in national and international waters. National governments and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources have successfully adopted multiple MPAs in the Southern Ocean despite the challenging nature of establishing MPAs in international waters. But are these MPAs representative of Southern Ocean biodiversity? Here we answer this question for both existing and proposed Antarctic MPAs, using benthic and pelagic regionalizations as a proxy for biodiversity. Currently about 11.98% of the Southern Ocean is protected in MPAs, with 4.61% being encompassed by no-take areas. While this is a relatively large proportion of protection when compared to other international waters, current Antarctic MPAs are not representative of the full range of benthic and pelagic ecoregions. Implementing additional protected areas, including those currently under negotiation, would encompass almost 22% of the Southern Ocean. It would also substantially improve representation with 17 benthic and pelagic ecoregions (out of 23 and 19, respectively) achieving at least 10% representation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAntarctic RegionsBiodiversityEcosystemOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID32320423
PMCPMC7176077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.