ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2020
Indications for abdominal imaging: When and what to choose?
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inappropriate imaging requests in abdominal imaging: observations from the MIDAS study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Germany.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Trial
- Acute abdominal pain in oncology patients: diagnostic challenges and imaging insights.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- State of abdominal CT datasets: A critical review of bias, clinical relevance, and real-world applicability.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Role of magnetic resonance in bowel pathologies: Beyond inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Iodinated Contrast Media Dose Protocols for Computed Tomography Investigations of the Abdomen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Bedside Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography in Adult Neutropenic Patients with Acute Abdominal Symptoms: A Comparative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A non-inferiority trial comparing manual and automated high-level disinfection for reprocessing of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound probes.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Hepatopancreatic Tumor Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Ultrasound Characteristics of Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Multicenter Analysis.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical decision-making in splenic hydatid cyst management via successful total splenectomy: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- [Imaging in chronic inflammatory bowel disease].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- Application of Quantitative Ultrasonography and Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Severity of Fatty Liver: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Endometriosis in Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgical Procedures: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- A retrieval-augmented chatbot based on GPT-4 provides appropriate differential diagnosis in gastrointestinal radiology: a proof of concept study.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- CT Evaluation of Long-Term Changes in Common Bile Duct Diameter after Cholecystectomy.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Article
- From strength to precision: A systematic review exploring the clinical utility of 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in abdominal imaging.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Reviving Hope: A Comprehensive Review of Post-resuscitation Care in Pediatric ICUs After Cardiac Arrest.Cureus · 2023Review
- Challenges and Prospective of Enhancing Hydatid Cyst Chemotherapy by Nanotechnology and the Future of Nanobiosensors for Diagnosis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging has a very important role in evaluating abdominal pathology. A good knowledge of indications is of crucial importance in the management of the patient with abdominal pathology. Ultrasound, which on its own can lead to an accurate diagnosis, plays a pivotal role in the management of abdominal pathology. The use of ultrasound contrast agents has significantly improved ultrasound diagnostic capacities in both hepatic and non-hepatic pathology. The use of computed tomography should be limited due to the potential harmful side effects of ionizing radiation, but it has established roles in evaluating severe abdominal traumatic and non-traumatic emergencies as well as in staging oncologic patients. Magnetic resonance imaging has very limited utility in abdominal emergencies due to difficulty of accessing the scanner and the long duration of the examination compared to computed tomography or ultrasound. However, magnetic resonance imaging has well-established clinical roles particularly for evaluating diffuse or focal hepatic pathology, benign and malignant bile duct pathology, pancreatic tumors, inflammatory bowel disease and rectal tumors. The aims of the following paper are to familiarize the clinician with the indications for imaging in abdominal pathology, to guide the clinician and radiologist in choosing the correct technique for a particular clinical situation, to prevent the overuse of imaging techniques and to prevent misdiagnosis of disease and incorrect therapy resulting from inappropriate imaging. Imaging has a very important role in evaluating abdominal pathology. A good knowledge of indications is of crucial importance in the management of the patient with abdominal pathology. Ultrasound, which on its own can lead to an accurate diagnosis, plays a pivotal role in the management of abdominal pathology. The use of ultrasound contrast agents has significantly improved ultrasound diagnostic capacities in both hepatic and non-hepatic pathology. The use of computed tomography should be limited due to the potential harmful side effects of ionizing radiation, but it has established roles in evaluating severe abdominal traumatic and non-traumatic emergencies as well as in staging oncologic patients. Magnetic resonance imaging has very limited utility in abdominal emergencies due to difficulty of accessing the scanner and the long duration of the examination compared to computed tomography or ultrasound. However, magnetic resonance imaging has well-established clinical roles particularly for evaluating diffuse or focal hepatic pathology, benign and malignant bile duct pathology, pancreatic tumors, inflammatory bowel disease and rectal tumors. The aims of the following paper are to familiarize the clinician with the indications for imaging in abdominal pathology, to guide the clinician and radiologist in choosing the correct technique for a particular clinical situation, to prevent the overuse of imaging techniques and to prevent misdiagnosis of disease and incorrect therapy resulting from inappropriate imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.