Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32320123›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

From a deep learning model back to the brain-Identifying regional predictors and their relation to aging.

Gidon Levakov, Gideon Rosenthal, Ilan Shelef, Tammy Riklin Raviv, Galia Avidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regional brain aging patterns reveal disease-specific pathways of neurodegeneration.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gidon LevakovDepartment of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5520-3556
Gideon RosenthalDepartment of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ilan ShelefZlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Tammy Riklin RavivZlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Galia AvidanDepartment of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHENGJIE XIONG · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, ANNE · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
MORPHOMETRY BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORKU24RR021382 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2004 to 2008
$24.1M
ULTRAHIGH FIELD TECHNOLOGY FOR FUNCTIONAL IMAGINGP41RR014075 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOAS, DAVID A · 1999 to 2011
$16.4M
TrainingU54EB020406 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND COGNITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAP50MH071616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2004 to 2008
$11.2M
Human Translational Applications Core (HTA - Core) (7 of 8)PL1MH083271 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2007 to 2011
$5.8M
Translational Methods/Facilities Core (TMF - Core) (8 of 8)PL1NS062410 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EVANS, CHRISTOPHER J. · 2007 to 2011
$4.6M
Translational Models of Memory and Cognitive Control (Component 5 of 8)RL1MH083270 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENTSCH, J. DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Whole Genome Assoc. Analysis Strategies for Multi. PhenotypesRL1MH083268 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR014075NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR016594NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021382NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB023398NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020406NIDA NIH HHS RL1 DA024853NIDCR NIH HHS UL1 DE019580NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087770NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH071616NIMH NIH HHS PL1 MH083271NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH096321NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH107045NIMH NIH HHS RL1 MH083268NIMH NIH HHS RL1 MH083269NIMH NIH HHS RL1 MH083270NINDS NIH HHS PL1 NS062410NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS074540NLM NIH HHS RL1 LM009833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a Deep Learning framework for the prediction of chronological age from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. Previous findings associate increased brain age with neurodegenerative diseases and higher mortality rates. However, the importance of brain age prediction goes beyond serving as biomarkers for neurological disorders. Specifically, utilizing convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis to identify brain regions contributing to the prediction can shed light on the complex multivariate process of brain aging. Previous work examined methods to attribute pixel/voxel-wise contributions to the prediction in a single image, resulting in "explanation maps" that were found noisy and unreliable. To address this problem, we developed an inference scheme for combining these maps across subjects, thus creating a population-based, rather than a subject-specific map. We applied this method to a CNN ensemble trained on predicting subjects' age from raw T1 brain images in a lifespan sample of 10,176 subjects. Evaluating the model on an untouched test set resulted in mean absolute error of 3.07 years and a correlation between chronological and predicted age of r = 0.98. Using the inference method, we revealed that cavities containing cerebrospinal fluid, previously found as general atrophy markers, had the highest contribution for age prediction. Comparing maps derived from different models within the ensemble allowed to assess differences and similarities in brain regions utilized by the model. We showed that this method substantially increased the replicability of explanation maps, converged with results from voxel-based morphometry age studies and highlighted brain regions whose volumetric variability correlated the most with the prediction error.

Indexed as

AgingDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrainChildChild, PreschoolDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbrain agingconvolutional neural networksdeep learninginterpretabilityneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID32320123
PMCPMC7426775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.