Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2020
Analysis of Early Intervention Services on Adult Judicial Outcomes.
Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes in first-episode psychoses: does age at admission matter?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Do early intervention services for psychosis maintain their effects after transition to usual/modular care? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Coordinated Specialty Care Through Early Detection: Impact of Reduced Duration of Untreated Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Patterns and correlates of health service contact prior to serious offences by people with severe mental illness.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Establishment of a Public Mental Health Database for Research Purposes in the Ferrara Province: Development and Preliminary Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Sampling from different populations: Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional differences between samples of first episode psychosis individuals and clinical high-risk individuals who progressed to psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2023Article
- Reducing Delay From Referral to Admission at a U.S. First-Episode Psychosis Service: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Reducing the Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) in a US Community: A Quasi-Experimental Trial.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2022Article
- Could Expanding and Investing in First-Episode Psychosis Services Prevent Aggressive Behaviour and Violent Crime?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- First help-seeking attempt before and after psychosis onset: measures of delay and aversive pathways to care.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Article
- Youth mental health in the time of COVID-19.Irish journal of psychological medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.