Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32320001›Full record

SynthesisJAMA dermatology2020

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Aaron M Drucker, Alexandra G Ellis, Michal Bohdanowicz, Soudeh Mashayekhi, Zenas Z N Yiu, Bram Rochwerg, Sonya Di Giorgio, Bernd W M Arents, Tim Burton, Phyllis I Spuls and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European Guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: Living update.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Aaron M DruckerDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra G EllisCenter for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Michal BohdanowiczDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Soudeh MashayekhiUnit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Zenas Z N YiuDermatology Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sonya Di GiorgioLibraries & Collections, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bernd W M ArentsDutch Association for People With Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, the Netherlands.
Tim BurtonPatient Representative (independent), Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Phyllis I SpulsDepartment of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Denise KüsterCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Doreen SiegelsCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jochen SchmittCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Carsten FlohrUnit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBTU Dresden · DEBrown University · USGGD Amsterdam · NLKing's College London · GBMcMaster University · CANIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Most clinical trials assessing systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis are placebo-controlled. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 28, 2019. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials of 8 weeks or more of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened in duplicate. Of 10 324 citations, 39 trials were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted in duplicate, and the review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Network Meta-Analyses guidelines. Random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes were change in signs of disease, symptoms, quality of life, itch, withdrawals, and serious adverse events. Results: A total of 39 trials with 6360 patients examining 20 medications and placebo were included. Most trials were conducted for adults receiving up to 16 weeks of therapy. Dupilumab, 300 mg every 2 weeks, was associated with improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score vs placebo (mean difference, 11.3-point reduction; 95% credible interval [CrI], 9.7-13.1 [high certainty]). Cyclosporine (standardized mean difference, -1.1; 95% CrI, -1.7 to -0.5 [low certainty]) and dupilumab (standardized mean difference, -0.9; 95% CrI, -1.0 to -0.8 [high certainty]) were similarly effective vs placebo in clearing clinical signs of atopic dermatitis and may be superior to methotrexate (standardized mean difference, -0.6; 95% CrI, -1.1 to 0.0 [low certainty]) and azathioprine (standardized mean difference, -0.4; 95% CrI, -0.8 to -0.1 [low certainty]). Several investigational medications for atopic dermatitis are promising, but data to date are limited to small early-phase trials. Safety analyses were limited by low event rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Dupilumab and cyclosporine may be more effective for up to 16 weeks of treatment than methotrexate and azathioprine for treating adult patients with atopic dermatitis. More studies directly comparing established and novel treatments beyond 16 weeks are needed and will be incorporated into future updates of this review.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicDermatologic AgentsImmunologic FactorsPruritusAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineCyclosporineHumansMethotrexateQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineCyclosporineDermatologic AgentsdupilumabImmunologic FactorsMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID32320001
PMCPMC7177646
OpenAlexW3016966216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.