SynthesisJAMA dermatology2020
Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Systemic Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis in the Head-and-Neck-Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- European Guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: Living update.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Guideline
- Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adolescents: A US Expert Consensus.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Guideline
- Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Update of a Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA dermatology · 2022Pooled it
- Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP), a systematic review of atopic dermatitis clinical practice guidelines: are they clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence based (CUTE)?The British journal of dermatology · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment Guidelines for Atopic Dermatitis Since the Approval of Dupilumab: A Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal Using AGREE-II.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021Pooled it
- Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ciclosporin versus methotrexate in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in children and young people (TREAT): a multicentre parallel group assessor-blinded clinical trial.The British journal of dermatology · 2023Trial
- Baricitinib Safety for Events of Special Interest in Populations at Risk: Analysis from Randomised Trial Data Across Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Indications.Advances in therapy · 2023Trial
- Impact of Oral Abrocitinib Monotherapy on Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2021Trial
- Article
- The Western Japan Atopic Dermatitis Registry (WJADR): A Multicenter Real-World Registry of Systemic Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Calcineurin Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: Balancing Tradition with Emerging Therapeutics.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Short-Term Efficacy of Lebrikizumab Versus Dupilumab in Combination with Topical Corticosteroids in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Update of the evidence- and consensus-based S3 guideline on atopic dermatitis: Systemic therapy with biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors and specific aspects of systemic therapy in pregnancy and lactation.Allergologie select · 2026Article
- Systemic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric Patients up to 12 Years of Age: Real-World Treatment Outcomes from the PEDISTAD Registry.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Observational
- Atopic Dermatitis Management: from Conventional Therapies to Biomarker-Driven Treatment Approaches.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2025Review
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Most clinical trials assessing systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis are placebo-controlled. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 28, 2019. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials of 8 weeks or more of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened in duplicate. Of 10 324 citations, 39 trials were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted in duplicate, and the review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Network Meta-Analyses guidelines. Random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes were change in signs of disease, symptoms, quality of life, itch, withdrawals, and serious adverse events. Results: A total of 39 trials with 6360 patients examining 20 medications and placebo were included. Most trials were conducted for adults receiving up to 16 weeks of therapy. Dupilumab, 300 mg every 2 weeks, was associated with improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score vs placebo (mean difference, 11.3-point reduction; 95% credible interval [CrI], 9.7-13.1 [high certainty]). Cyclosporine (standardized mean difference, -1.1; 95% CrI, -1.7 to -0.5 [low certainty]) and dupilumab (standardized mean difference, -0.9; 95% CrI, -1.0 to -0.8 [high certainty]) were similarly effective vs placebo in clearing clinical signs of atopic dermatitis and may be superior to methotrexate (standardized mean difference, -0.6; 95% CrI, -1.1 to 0.0 [low certainty]) and azathioprine (standardized mean difference, -0.4; 95% CrI, -0.8 to -0.1 [low certainty]). Several investigational medications for atopic dermatitis are promising, but data to date are limited to small early-phase trials. Safety analyses were limited by low event rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Dupilumab and cyclosporine may be more effective for up to 16 weeks of treatment than methotrexate and azathioprine for treating adult patients with atopic dermatitis. More studies directly comparing established and novel treatments beyond 16 weeks are needed and will be incorporated into future updates of this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.