ArticleRegenerative medicine2020
Challenging misinformation and engaging patients: characterizing a regenerative medicine consult service.
Article in Regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Ethical Implications of Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Purposes: A Systematic Review.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- (Mis)trust among patients seeking unproven stem cell therapies: a qualitative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical translation of tissue-engineered oesophageal grafts: are patients ready for us?Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- An Evaluation of the Design of Multimedia Patient Education Materials in Musculoskeletal Health Care: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2024Review
- Perceptions of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- A Review of the Design of Multimedia Patient Educational Materials in Low Back Pain Research.Physical therapy research · 2024Review
- Stem cells, cell therapies, and bioengineering in lung biology and disease 2021.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2022Review
- Patients seeking stem cell therapies-a prospective qualitative analysis from a Regenerative Medicine Consult Service.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Role of Physicians in Guiding Patients Away From Unproven Stem Cell Interventions.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2022Article
- Unproven stem cell interventions: A global public health problem requiring global deliberation.Stem cell reports · 2021Review
- Regenerative medicine clinical readiness.Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Stem cell preservation for regenerative therapies: ethical and governance considerations for the health care sector.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Review
- The Direct to Consumer Stem Cell Market and the Role of Primary Care Providers in Correcting Misinformation.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.