Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32319740›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

Sex-dependent least toxic timing of irinotecan combined with chronomodulated chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Randomized multicenter EORTC 05011 trial.

Pasquale F Innominato, Annabelle Ballesta, Qi Huang, Christian Focan, Philippe Chollet, Abdoulaye Karaboué, Sylvie Giacchetti, Mohamed Bouchahda, René Adam, Carlo Garufi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temozolomide Chronotherapy in Glioma: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Metastasis in biological time.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Pasquale F InnominatoNorth Wales Cancer Centre, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Annabelle BallestaDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Chronotherapy Team, Cancer Research Centre, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Qi HuangDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Chronotherapy Team, Cancer Research Centre, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Christian FocanDepartment of Oncology, Clinique Saint-Joseph, CHC-Liège Hospital Group, Liège, Belgium.
Philippe CholletClinical and Translational Research Division, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Abdoulaye KarabouéMedical Oncology Unit, GHI Le Raincy-Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France.
Sylvie GiacchettiUMRS 935, "Cancer Chronotherapy and Postoperative Liver Functions", French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France.
Mohamed BouchahdaUMRS 935, "Cancer Chronotherapy and Postoperative Liver Functions", French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France.
René AdamUMRS 935, "Cancer Chronotherapy and Postoperative Liver Functions", French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France.
Carlo GarufiDivision of Medical Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy.
Francis A LéviDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Chronotherapy Team, Cancer Research Centre, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1364-7463
Université Paris-Sud · FRCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITCentre Jean Perrin · FRClinique Saint-Joseph · BEGroupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil · FRUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C53561/A19933Medical Research Council MR/M013170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The least toxic time (LTT) of irinotecan varied by up to 8 hours according to sex and genetic background in mice. The translational relevance was investigated within a randomized trial dataset, where no LTT stood out significantly in the whole population. 130 male and 63 female eligible patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive chronomodulated Irinotecan with peak delivery rate at 1 of 6 clock hours staggered by 4 hours on day 1, then fixed-time chronomodulated Fluorouracil-Leucovorin-Oxaliplatin for 4 days, q3 weeks. The sex-specific circadian characteristics of grade (G) 3-4 toxicities were mapped with cosinor and time*sex interactions confirmed with Fisher's exact test. Baseline characteristics of male or female patients were similar in the six treatment groups. Main grade 3-4 toxicities over six courses were diarrhea (males vs females, 39.2%; vs 46.0%), neutropenia (15.6% vs 15.0%), fatigue (11.5% vs 15.9%), and anorexia (10.0% vs 7.8%). They were reduced following irinotecan peak delivery in the morning for males, but in the afternoon for females, with statistically significant rhythms (P < .05 from cosinor) and sex*timing interactions (Fisher's exact test, diarrhea, P = .023; neutropenia, P = .015; fatigue, P = .062; anorexia, P = .032). Irinotecan timing was most critical for females, with grades 3-4 ranging from 55.2% of the patients (morning) to 29.4% (afternoon) for diarrhea, and from 25.9% (morning) to 0% (afternoon) for neutropenia. The study results support irinotecan administration in the morning for males and in the afternoon for females, in order to minimize adverse events without impairing efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEuropeFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinchronotherapycircadiancolorectal cancergenderirinotecantoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32319740
PMCPMC7300418
OpenAlexW3017098321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.