Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32319724›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2020

Non-memory subjective cognitive concerns predict incident motoric cognitive risk syndrome.

C Nester, E Ayers, L Rabin, J Verghese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Elevated Blood Homocysteine Increases the Risk of Incident Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: A Two-Cohort Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. "Cognitive" Criteria in Older Adults With Slow Gait Speed: Implications for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prodromal Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome and Everyday Function.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C NesterDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York (CUNY), Queens, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-2786
E AyersDepartments of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
L RabinDepartment of Psychology, Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.
J VergheseDepartments of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

The biological underpinnings of Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome: a multi-center studyR01AG057548 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI VERGHESE, JOE · 2020 to 2024
$8.0M
Biological and neural mechanisms of fallsR01AG044007 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI VERGHESE, JOE · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
Central Control of Mobility in AgingR01AG036921 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI HOLTZER, ROEE · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
The biological underpinnings of Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome: a multi-center studyR56AG057548 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI VERGHESE, JOE · 2017 to 2017
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036921NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044007NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057548NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057548Resnick Gerontology Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMotoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a predementia condition that combines slow gait and subjective cognitive concerns. As the earliest markers of MCR are relatively unknown, the role of subjective cognitive concerns was investigated to predict incident MCR in a well-characterized prospective cohort of non-demented older adults.

methodsNon-demented MCR-free older adults (n = 476) from the Central Control of Mobility in Aging cohort completed gait, subjective cognition and neuropsychological assessment at baseline and follow-up. Subjective concerns were analyzed via responses to 12 items from three validated measures, the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument - Disability Component, the Activities of Daily Living Prevention Instrument and the Geriatric Depression Scale, and were independent of items utilized to diagnose MCR. Cox proportional hazard models examined the association between cognitive concerns and incident MCR.

resultsAfter 2.36 ± 1.4 years, 28 participants developed MCR. Executive functioning (adjusted hazard ratio 2.458, 95% confidence interval 1.094-5.524, P = 0.029) and mental clarity concerns (adjusted hazard ratio 3.917, 95% confidence interval 1.690-9.077, P = 0.001) were associated with incident MCR, controlling for age, sex, education and gait speed.

conclusionsSubjective cognitive concerns in non-memory cognitive domains predict incident MCR. Although most MCR studies assess cognitive concerns about memory, our findings suggest the need to broaden the scope of subjective cognitive assessment to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and prediction of future cognitive decline.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersActivities of Daily LivingAgedCognitionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesRisk Factorsgaitmotoric cognitive risk syndromepredementiasubjective cognitive concerns

Identifiers

PMID32319724
PMCPMC7755125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.