ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2020
Automatic Derivation of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Settings: Comparison with In-Laboratory Titration.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of apap parameters in one to three nights titration for final pressure decision-making in a real world clinical setting.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- CPAP Titration Pressure in Split-Night, Full-Night, and Home Auto-Titration: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Patients With Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- A Data-Driven Framework for Clinical Decision Support Systems in Positive Airway Pressure and Oxygen Titration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Brazilian Thoracic Association Consensus on Sleep-disordered Breathing.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2022Article
- The Evaluation of APAP Titration Results: Good Titration Versus TECSA and Unacceptable Titration.Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- Titration studies overestimate continuous positive airway pressure requirements in uncomplicated obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021Article
- Alternative Procedure to Individual Nasal Pressure Titration for Sleep Apnea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Optimal positive airway pressure requirement and polysomnography indices of obstructive sleep apnea severity in the Saudi population.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThis study was designed to investigate differences in the final recommended pressure setting between that derived from an autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) device and manual in-laboratory continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, as well as the factors that influence pressure differences in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
methodsThis study enrolled 50 patients with OSA. All patients underwent both APAP titration and manual CPAP titration. We obtained the average device pressure ≤90% of the time (APAP₉₀) from the downloaded manual for the APAP machine and the optimal pressure obtained by manual CPAP titration (CPAP
resultsThe values of APAP₉₀ and CPAP
conclusionsWhile the mean pressure in the overall cohort did not differ significantly between APAP₉₀ and CPAP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.