Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32319194›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2020

Bayesian accrual modeling and prediction in multicenter clinical trials with varying center activation times.

Junhao Liu, Jo Wick, Yu Jiang, Matthew Mayo, Byron Gajewski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junhao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-7454
Jo WickDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Yu JiangDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew MayoDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Byron GajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigators who manage multicenter clinical trials need to pay careful attention to patterns of subject accrual, and the prediction of activation time for pending centers is potentially crucial for subject accrual prediction. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model to predict subject accrual for multicenter clinical trials in which center activation times vary. We define center activation time as the time at which a center can begin enrolling patients in the trial. The difference in activation times between centers is assumed to follow an exponential distribution, and the model of subject accrual integrates prior information for the study with actual enrollment progress. We apply our proposed Bayesian multicenter accrual model to two multicenter clinical studies. The first is the PAIN-CONTRoLS study, a multicenter clinical trial with a goal of activating 40 centers and enrolling 400 patients within 104 weeks. The second is the HOBIT trial, a multicenter clinical trial with a goal of activating 14 centers and enrolling 200 subjects within 36 months. In summary, the Bayesian multicenter accrual model provides a prediction of subject accrual while accounting for both center- and individual patient-level variation.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBayes TheoremClinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SelectionTime FactorsBayesian modelcenter activation timecenters decisionmulticenter clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID32319194
PMCPMC7529726
OpenAlexW3017260292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.