Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32319175›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2020

Evaluation of the efficacy of topical sucralfate on healing haemorrhoidectomy incision wounds and reducing pain severity: A randomised clinical trial.

Amir K Vejdan, Maliheh Khosravi, Zahra Amirian, Maryam Daneshmand, Bahman Babak, Khorashdi Samira, Seifi Azin, Salehitorabi Kosar, Khodadadzadeh Razie

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amir K VejdanGeneral Surgery Unit, Imam Reza Hospital, Birjand, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-8536
Maliheh KhosraviShariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra AmirianImam Reza Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Maryam DaneshmandDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Bahman BabakDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Khorashdi SamiraDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Seifi AzinDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Salehitorabi KosarDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Khodadadzadeh RazieDepartment of general surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Birjand University of Medical Sciences · IRImam Reza Hospital · IRShariati Hospital · IR

Funding

Birjand University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healing of haemorrhoidectomy wounds is a main concern of surgeons and patients. Various modalities can improve the quality of wound care after surgery. Antibiotics and topical agents, such as solutions and ointments, have been evaluated. The current research investigates the effects of sucralfate ointment on wound healing (epithelialisation) and postoperative pain after open haemorrhoidectomy. This trial involves two groups of randomly collected patients (n = 40) who underwent open haemorrhoidectomy surgery by the Milligan-Morgan method. A 10% topical sucralfate ointment was applied to the investigated group's wounds, while the control group patients used Vaseline as a placebo. The present work measured the two outcomes as follows: pain severity by a Visual Analogues Scale (VAS) score and epithelialisation by a surgeon's visual inspection. During the postoperative phase, the mean VAS was 3.70 for the investigated group and 6.90 for the control group. On the average, the completion of epithelialisation for the investigated group was on day 13 as opposed to day 20 for the control group. The topical application of sucralfate ointment on post-haemorrhoidectomy wound is an effective method for the promotion of healing, also lessens the severity of pain, and reduces the need for analgesics.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsAnti-Ulcer AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemorrhoidectomyHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedOintmentsPostoperative PainSucralfateAnalgesicsAnti-Ulcer AgentsOintmentsSucralfateepithelialisationhaemorrhoidectomysucralfatewound healing

Identifiers

PMID32319175
PMCPMC7948644
OpenAlexW3016406821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.