ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Heavy metals in aquatic products and the health risk assessment to population in China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Patterns of Aquatic Product Risks in China Based on Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk assessment of heavy metals in north of Iran (Sari) rice and implications for human health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Community Awareness and Health Risk of Heavy Metals Through Consumption of Sardine (Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Analysis of Heavy Metal Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of Dried Fish Marketed in Guangzhou, China.Biological trace element research · 2025Article
- Proximate composition, microbial quality and heavy metal concentration of fresh Nile tilapia fillet in Lake Tana, Ethiopia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Occurrence and health risk assessment of toxic metals and rare earth elements in microalgae: Insight into potential risk factors in new sustainable food resources.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Heavy Metals Assessment and Health Risk to Consumers of Two Commercial Fish Species from Polyculture Fishponds in El-Sharkia and Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt: Physiological and Biochemical Study.Biological trace element research · 2024Article
- Heavy Metal Levels and Cancer Risk Assessments of the Commercial Denis, Sparus aurata Collected from Bardawil Lake and Private Fish Farm Waters as a Cultured Source, Egypt.Biological trace element research · 2024Article
- Cadmium Exposure in Aquatic Products and Health Risk Classification Assessment in Residents of Zhejiang, China.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative secretomic and proteomic analysis reveal multiple defensive strategies developed byFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Food safety of the green tiger shrimp Penaeus semisulcatus from the Persian Gulf.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Investigation of Bioaccumulation and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Crayfish (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Heavy metal accumulation and health risk assessment of crayfish in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River during 2015-2017.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- First Experimental Evidence for the Presence of Potentially ToxicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, a total of 62,712 aquatic product samples were collected from 32 provinces of China during 2015-2017. By analyzing the spatial distributions and non-parametric tests of five heavy metals (lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and arsenic (As)) in four aquatic product (fish (n = 44,353), shrimp (n = 8453), crab (n = 5367), and shellfish (n = 4539)), it was found that the concentrations of the five heavy metals in the same aquatic product are significantly different in different regions. Furthermore, we calculated daily estimated intake (EDI) of each of the five heavy metals and assessed non-cancer risk and cancer risk using target hazard quotient (THQ) and target cancer risk (TR), respectively. The results showed that for mean exposure levels, the THQ values in four aquatic products were all below one, meaning that there was no non-carcinogenic risk. For high exposure levels, the hazard index (HI) value exceeded one in fish in North China, which means the potential non-carcinogenic risk should not be ignored. As for cadmium, most of the TR values in crab and shellfish exceed 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
32319067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.