Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32319039›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2020

Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Narrative Review.

Vincent Martin, Karen Hamrick Samaan, Sheena Aurora, Eric M Pearlman, Chunmei Zhou, Xiaoping Li, Robert Pallay

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent MartinUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Karen Hamrick SamaanLilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA. karen.samaan@lilly.com.
Sheena AuroraEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eric M PearlmanLilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Chunmei ZhouEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Xiaoping LiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Robert PallayDepartment of Family Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USMercer University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a debilitating neurologic disease. People who experience migraine can have substantial disability, impaired functioning and a decreased quality of life (QoL). Expert recommendations suggest that people with frequent migraine attacks or severe impairment related to attacks may benefit from preventive treatment. Despite these recommendations and the existence of evidence-based guidelines for the use of preventive medication, many people who are candidates for preventive therapies do not receive them. Thus, there is still a substantial unmet need for preventive migraine treatment. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has a demonstrated role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Galcanezumab-gnlm (galcanezumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CGRP ligand and prevents binding to its receptor. It is administered as a once-monthly subcutaneous injection. The aim of this review is to present a comprehensive overview of the existing short- and long-term efficacy and safety data for galcanezumab in patients with migraine. Data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2 and REGAIN studies show that galcanezumab treatment for 3 or 6 months results in overall reduction in mean monthly migraine headache days in patients with episodic (EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2) and chronic (REGAIN) migraine. Greater proportions of patients with episodic migraine receiving galcanezumab versus placebo demonstrated a ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% response to therapy and reported a lower level of disability and an improvement in functioning and QoL. Similarly, when compared with placebo, greater proportions of patients with chronic migraine treated with galcanezumab demonstrated a ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% response and reported improved functioning. A 12-month open-label study demonstrated the continued efficacy of galcanezumab for up to 12 months. In all studies galcanezumab was well tolerated. In conclusion, data from pivotal studies show that galcanezumab may fulfill an unmet need in the treatment of patients with migraine who require preventive therapy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedgalcanezumabImmunologic FactorsCGRP antagonistsChronic migraineEpisodic migraineGalcanezumabMigraineMigraine prevention

Identifiers

PMID32319039
PMCPMC7467458
OpenAlexW3017162106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.