Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318996›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2020

Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Severe Obesity: Review and Perspectives.

Panagiotis Lainas, Joseph Derienne, Carmelisa Dammaro, Naim Schoucair, Niaz Devaquet, Ibrahim Dagher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Panagiotis LainasDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital AP-HP, F-92140, Clamart, France. panagiotis.lainas@aphp.fr.
Joseph DerienneDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital and University Saint Joseph Medical School, Beirut, Lebanon.
Carmelisa DammaroDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital AP-HP, F-92140, Clamart, France.
Naim SchoucairDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital AP-HP, F-92140, Clamart, France.
Niaz DevaquetDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital AP-HP, F-92140, Clamart, France.
Ibrahim DagherDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital AP-HP, F-92140, Clamart, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report aims to review current data on single-incision (single-port) laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for bariatric surgery. A comprehensive research of Pubmed database and Cochrane library on SILS bariatric surgery was conducted. Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria (3611 patients). Intraoperative and clinical outcomes for SILS sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) seem comparable to conventional laparoscopy. SILS for SG was safe and feasible with good outcomes. The same stands for RYGB but more studies are necessary for safe conclusions, while additional trocars are necessary to perform the procedure. AGB is feasible and safe by SILS but the declining number of annual procedures will probably limit the use of SILS. Major studies are unavailable for SILS and other bariatric procedures.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastroplastyLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryGastric bypassObesitySILSSingle-portSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.