Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318991›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up.

L Regusci, F Fasolini, P Meinero, G Caccia, G Ruggeri, M Serati, A Braga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L RegusciDepartment of General Surgery, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
F FasoliniDepartment of General Surgery, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
P MeineroDepartment of General Surgery, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
G CacciaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Turconi 23 CP 1652, 6850, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
G RuggeriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Turconi 23 CP 1652, 6850, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
M SeratiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
A BragaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Turconi 23 CP 1652, 6850, Mendrisio, Switzerland. andybraga@libero.it.
Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio · CHUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the 3-year objective and subjective outcomes of patients with complex anorectal fistula treated with Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT). Furthermore, we evaluated the risk factors associated with recurrence.

methodsAll consecutive patients with complex anorectal fistula who underwent VAAFT in Beata Vergine Hospital of Mendrisio, Switzerland, from January 2013 to January 2016, were enrolled. Patients with suspicion or diagnosis of Crohn's disease, malignancy, previous history of radiotherapy or radical pelvic surgery were excluded. Preoperative clinical assessment based upon medical history, physical examination and endosonography, was performed in all patients. Data regarding subjective outcomes (the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, patient satisfaction scores and Wexner score), objective cure rate (absence of fistula at clinical examination), and adverse events were collected during follow-up. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate outcomes.

resultsOne hundred and four patients had VAAFT. At 3-year follow-up, 96 patients (92.3%) were available for the evaluation. At 3 years after surgery, 81 of 96 patients (84.4%) declared themselves cured (p = 0.60). Similarly, at 3-year evaluation, 80 of 96 patients (83.3%) were objectively cured (p = 0.52). No serious intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. All recurrences were treated with a repeat VAAFT procedure resulting in a complete healing. Uni and multivariate analysis of variables potentially involved in the failure of VAAFT showed that age ≥ 50 years was the only factor associated at risk of recurrence.

conclusionsVAAFT is a highly effective safe procedure for the treatment of anorectal fistula, with a low recurrence rate at 3-year follow-up. However, our study demonstrated that age ≥ 50 years is a risk factor for failure of VAAFT.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaVideo-Assisted SurgeryAnal CanalFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSwitzerlandTreatment OutcomeAnorectal fistulaFistuloscopyRectumVAAFT

Identifiers

PMID32318991
OpenAlexW3017165628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.