Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318989›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Use of a new transanal irrigation device for bowel disorder management by patients familiar with the irrigation technique: a prospective, interventional, multicenter pilot study.

K Charvier, V Bonniaud, D Waz, C Desprez, A-M Leroi

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transanal irrigation in clinical practice: a scoping review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

K CharvierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Henry Gabrielle Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Center, 69230, St Genis Laval, France. kathleen.charvier@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-7729
V BonniaudDepartment of Physical Médicine and Rehabilitation, Le Bocage Hospital, Dijon Regional University Hospital Center, Dijon, France.
D WazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Henry Gabrielle Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Center, 69230, St Genis Laval, France.
C DesprezDepartment of Digestive Physiology and CIC-CRB 1404, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1073, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-7675
A-M LeroiDepartment of Digestive Physiology and CIC-CRB 1404, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1073, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4203
Inserm · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRLyon College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of transanal irrigation (TAI) with a new medical device incorporating an electric pump, the IryPump®R Set.

methodsAn interventional, prospective, open-label, non-comparative, multicenter pilot study on TAI was conducted at three French university hospitals. Patients with experience of TAI were enrolled for a 1-month period during which 5 consecutive TAIs were performed using the IryPump®R Set (B.Braun Melsungen AG Melsungen, Germany). The study's primary efficacy criterion was successful TAI, defined as (i) use of the patient's usual irrigation volume of water, (ii) stool evacuation, and (iii) the absence of leakage between TAIs. The first two TAIs were not taken into account in the main analysis. The secondary outcome measures were device acceptability, bowel dysfunction scores, tolerability, and safety.

resultsFifteen patients were included between November 2016 and May 2017, and 14 were assessed in the main analysis. The TAI success rate was 72.4% (21 out of 29 procedures). The bowel dysfunction scores at the end of the study did not differ significantly from those recorded on inclusion. A high proportion of patients (> 70%) reported that TAI was feasible with the new medical device. There were no serious adverse events or device-related adverse events. At the end of the study, 50% of the participants were willing to consider further use of the new device.

conclusionsIn patients familiar with TAI, using a new medical device incorporating an electric pump was feasible. Levels of patient satisfaction were high, especially with regard to comfort of use and a feeling of security during TAI.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceAnal CanalConstipationGermanyHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeBalloon catheterEfficacyElectric pumpSafetyTransanal irrigation

Identifiers

PMID32318989
PMCPMC7297826
OpenAlexW3016921301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.