ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Correlation between sub-Tenon's anesthesia and transient amaurosis during ophthalmic surgery.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of trans-sub-Tenon's retrobulbar anesthesia for pars plana vitrectomy: a randomized trial.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Trial
- Evaluating the effectiveness of localized sub-Tenon's anesthesia in 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery.International ophthalmology · 2021Trial
- The effect of sub-Tenon versus topical anesthesia on pupil responses in the early postoperative period after cataract surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo verify the correlation between sub-Tenon's anesthesia and intraoperative visual loss in ophthalmic surgery.
methodsSixty-four patients underwent phacoemulsification combined pars plana vitrectomy under sub-Tenon's anesthesia. Participants were investigated about their light perception at several time points: before anesthesia, immediately after anesthesia, 10 min after anesthesia without any surgical intervention or microscope illumination, and after the whole surgery. Intraoperative amaurosis was determined as that a patient could not see any light from their operative eye. The incidence rate of amaurosis at different time points and among different anesthetists was analyzed.
resultsThe rate of intraoperative amaurosis was 0%, 1.56%, 48.44%, and 95.31% at several time points, respectively: before anesthesia, immediately after anesthesia, 10 min after anesthesia without any surgical intervention or microscope light exposure during the interval, and immediately after the whole surgery, presenting a significantly time-dependent increase (P < 0.01). There was no correlation between the amaurosis and different diseases and anesthesiologists. The amaurosis was transient, and all operative eyes could perceive light on the first postoperative day.
conclusionsSub-Tenon's anesthesia contributes to the intraoperative amaurosis during operation. Temporary interruption of optic nerve conduction by the anesthetic could be a credible explanation. The amaurosis is transient and reversible, requires no additional treatment, and should not be considered as a surgical complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.