ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2020
Risk factors and oncological outcomes of urethral recurrence in male patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion: a propensity score-matched case control study.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility analysis of arterial CT radiomics model to predict the risk of local and metastatic recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Association of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection with oncological outcomes in urothelial bladder cancer.Infectious agents and cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadical cystectomy (RC) is the primary treatment strategy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, it carries a high risk of urethral recurrence (UR) in male patients. The risk factors and oncological outcomes of UR remain unclear. We aimed to identify the risk factors and oncological outcomes of UR in male patients with MIBC after RC combined with urinary diversion.
methodsAfter propensity score matching, we evaluated 137 male patients with MIBC who underwent RC combined with urinary diversion at our center between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015. Patient demographics, comorbidity, and perioperative data were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsOf the 310 patients, 30 (9.7%) patients underwent UR. In the matched group, the independent risk factors of UR were history of TURB (HR = 3.069, P = 0.018), tumor stage (T3 vs. T2, HR = 3.997, P = 0.014; T4 vs. T2, HR = 2.962, P = 0.015), and tumor multifocality (HR = 2.854, P = 0.011). The CSS and OS of patients with UR were equivalent to the patients without UR (P = 0.295, P = 0.616).
conclusionThis propensity score-matched case-control study showed that UR is not rare in male patients with MIBC after RC combined with urinary diversion. We identified three independent risk factors of UR: history of TURB, tumor stage, and tumor mutifocality. The oncological outcomes were equivalent between patients with and without UR. These findings could help improve treatment strategies and follow-up schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.