Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318842›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2020

Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings.

Pablo Blanco

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488182 (The Value of Preoperative Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography Parameters in Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Elective Non-Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07488182 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Value of Preoperative Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography Parameters in Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Elective Non-Cardiac Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorNecmettin Erbakan UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled110ConditionsPost Induction Hypotension, Postoperative Morbidity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Comparative Evaluation of Three Transthoracic Echocardiographic Techniques for Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume Assessment Across Hemodynamic States.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in COJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo BlancoIntensive Care Physician, Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Cruz Azul, 2651, 60 St., 7630, Necochea, Argentina. ohtusabes@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8402-1092
Intensive Care Society · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) are basic hemodynamic parameters which aid in targeting organ perfusion and oxygen delivery in critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability. While there are several methods for obtaining this data, the use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is gaining acceptance among intensivists and emergency physicians. With TTE, there are several points that practitioners should consider to make estimations of the SV/CO as simplest as possible and avoid confounders. MAIN BODY: With TTE, the SV is usually obtained as the product of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cross-sectional area (CSA) by the LVOT velocity-time integral (LVOT VTI); the CO results as the product of the SV and the heart rate (HR). However, there are important drawbacks, especially when obtaining the LVOT CSA and thus the impaction in the calculated SV and CO. Given that the LVOT CSA is constant, any change in the SV and CO is highly dependent on variations in the LVOT VTI; the HR contributes to CO as well. Therefore, the LVOT VTI aids in monitoring the SV without the need to calculate the LVOT CSA; the minute distance (i.e., SV × HR) aids in monitoring the CO. This approach is useful for ongoing assessment of the CO status and the patient's response to interventions, such as fluid challenges or inotropic stimulation. When the LVOT VTI is not accurate or cannot be obtained, the mitral valve or right ventricular outflow tract VTI can also be used in the same fashion as LVOT VTI. Besides its pivotal role in hemodynamic monitoring, the LVOT VTI has been shown to predict outcomes in selected populations, such as in patients with acute decompensated HF and pulmonary embolism, where a low LVOT VTI is associated with a worse prognosis.

conclusionThe VTI and minute distance are simple, feasible and reproducible measurements to serially track the SV and CO and thus their high value in the hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients in point-of-care settings. In addition, the LVOT VTI is able to predict outcomes in selected populations.

Indexed as

Cardiac outputDopplerEchocardiographyPoint-of-careShockStroke volumeUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32318842
PMCPMC7174466
OpenAlexW3017148625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.