Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318834›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020

Endoscopic transpapillary stenting for the management of acute cholecystitis.

Danielle Hayes, Gary Lucas, Andrew Discolo, Bryce French, Sean Wells

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle HayesDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center - First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. Danielle.Hayes@swedish.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1164-4333
Gary LucasDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center - First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Andrew DiscoloDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center - First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Bryce FrenchDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center - First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Sean WellsDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center - First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Swedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment of acute cholecystitis. Patients who are considered not to be candidates for cholecystectomy are commonly recommended to undergo percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) tube placement; however, external drainage is undesirable for many patients. Endoscopic transpapillary stent placement (ETSP) has been described as an alternative method for decompression of the gallbladder. Data in support of this technique is limited to a handful of observational studies with variable indications. Our study sought to expand on the available data for the use of ETSP exclusively in the context of acute cholecystitis.

methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients with cholecystitis who underwent ETSP at our institution between January 2012 and July 2018. We collected data on indication, comorbidities, length of stay, laboratory values, outcomes, additional procedures, and whether cholecystectomy was eventually performed.

resultsDuring the study period, 12 patients underwent ETSP. The mean age was 68.2 years (± SD 12.4) with an average Anesthesia Society Assessment (ASA) class of 3.2. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was greater than seven in 75% of patients, indicating a 0% estimated 10-year survival. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator was used to estimate an average mortality risk for laparoscopic cholecystectomy of 4.8% (± 3.3, 95% CI) in our study population; the estimated risk in the general population is 0.1%. Immediate resolution of symptoms with endoscopic drainage was achieved in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%); one patient experienced no symptom resolution with endoscopic drainage nor subsequent PTGBD tube placement. Six of 12 (50%) patients experienced recurrence of symptoms requiring hospitalization, and two of 12 patients (16.7%) died secondary to biliary sepsis.

conclusionEndoscopic transpapillary stent placement is an alternative method for the management of acute cholecystitis patients who are not candidates for surgery. ETSP has a high technical success rate; however, it may result in a high rate of symptom recurrence and should only be utilized in select patients. Randomized studies would be beneficial to further investigate the utility and safety of ETSP in the management of acute cholecystitis.

Indexed as

DrainageEndoscopyStentsAgedAged, 80 and overCholangiographyCholecystitis, AcuteFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCholecystectomyCholecystitisEndoscopic transpapillary stentingGallbladder drainagePercutaneous cholecystostomy tube

Identifiers

PMID32318834
OpenAlexW3016324983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.