Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318773›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2020

Exposure to gadolinium and neurotoxicity: current status of preclinical and clinical studies.

Carlo A Mallio, Àlex Rovira, Paul M Parizel, Carlo C Quattrocchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prospective Safety Study of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Different Doses.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlo A MallioDepartmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy. c.mallio@unicampus.it.
Àlex RoviraSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona and Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Paul M ParizelDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Carlo C QuattrocchiDepartmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITAntwerp University Hospital · BEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGadolinium is a rare-earth lanthanide metal that is known to have a direct neurotoxic effect. The scope of the present review is to summarize the current preclinical and clinical evidence on the association between exposure to gadolinium of the central nervous system and neurotoxicity.

methodsA literature review was performed by searching for original research papers investigating on gadolinium exposure and neurotoxicity.

resultsGadolinium is neurotoxic through multiple mechanisms, mainly involving Ca

conclusionTo date, no cause-effect relationship has been demonstrated in patients between brain gadolinium exposure and clinical consequences specific to neurological toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaGadoliniumHumansNeurotoxicity SyndromesContrast MediaGadoliniumGadoliniumGadolinium-based contrast agentsMRINeurotoxicitySafety

Identifiers

PMID32318773
OpenAlexW3016593844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.