Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318767›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early stage breast cancer : Results from a phase II trial.

Jin Meng, Wenzhi Huang, Xin Mei, Xiaoli Yu, Ziqiang Pan, Jinli Ma, Xuejun Ma, Jiayi Chen, Xiaomao Guo, Zhaozhi Yang

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systematic risk analysis of radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer: role of cotreatment with chemo-, endocrine, and targeted therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jin MengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Wenzhi HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The PLA Navy Anqing Hospial, Anhui, China.
Xin MeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoli YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ziqiang PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jinli MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xuejun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiaotong University affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomao GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. guoxml800@163.com.
Zhaozhi YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. yzzhi2014@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report early toxicity and 5‑year clinical outcomes of adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 467 patients including 406 invasive breast cancer and 61 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were enrolled in a single institutional phase II trial. All patients underwent IMRT-SIB treatment to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 45 and 60 Gy, respectively, delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The grade of maximum acute skin toxicity during treatment was recorded. Lung toxicity was noted within 6 months and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded at the 12 month follow-up after the end of radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up.

resultsMedian follow-up time was 5.46 years. Median age was 46 years old (range 22-70 years old). No patient with DCIS had a local recurrence or distant metastasis. Among 406 patients with invasive breast cancer, the unadjusted 5‑year actuarial rate of locoregional control was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.5-100), and distant metastasis-free survival 98.7% (95% CI 97.4-100), respectively. Acute skin toxicity was recorded at grade 0-1 in 76.5% of patients, and grade 2 in 23.5% of patients. None of these patients had grade 3 or more than grade 3 skin toxicity. Grade 1 pneumonitis was found in 25.3% of patients. Assessment of patient reported cosmetic outcomes at the 12 month follow-up showed good or excellent outcome in 86.5% of cases.

conclusionsThe use of inversely planned IMRT-SIB as part of breast-conserving therapy results in optimal 5‑year tumor control and minor early toxicities.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAdjuvant radiotherapyBreast cancerBreast-conserving surgery (BCS)Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.