Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318743›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2020

Sutton Naevi as Melanoma Simulators: Can Confocal Microscopy Help in the Diagnosis?

Albert Brugués, Simone Ribero, Vanessa Martins da Silva, Paula Aguilera, Adriana P Garcia, Llucia Alós, Josep Malvehy, Susana Puig, Cristina Carrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Albert BruguésDermatology Department, Hospital Clínic and Melanoma Group IDIBAPS (Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer), ES-08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Simone Ribero
Vanessa Martins da Silva
Paula Aguilera
Adriana P Garcia
Llucia Alós
Josep Malvehy
Susana Puig
Cristina Carrera
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sutton naevi can sometimes present a challenging appearance with atypical presentation, also by dermoscopy. Reflectance confocal microscopy could help in making a diagnosis. This study prospectively collected two groups of Sutton nevi: the first one was composed by typical white halo naevi monitored for one year (13, 23%) and the second one was made up of atypical lesions excised in order to rule out melanoma, which were histologically diagnosed as Sutton naevi (21, 37%). These two groups of Sutton naevi were compared to a retrospectively collected cohort of thin melanomas with histologic regression features (23, 40%). On dermoscopy, atypical Sutton naevi and melanomas were indistinguishable. Reflectance confocal microscopy demonstrated significant differences at the dermo-epidermal junction: marked dermo-epidermal junction thickening and non-edged papilla were associated with melanoma, while the presence of nests was associated with Sutton naevi. However, reflectance confocal microscopy also detected marked intraepidermal pagetoid cells in Sutton naevi that were a combination of MelanA+ and CD1a+ cells. Sutton naevi can simulate melanoma, under both dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy. Nevertheless, relevant confocal dermo-epidermal junction features and the clinical scenario can be helpful to make a final diagnosis, especially in those situations where melanoma must be ruled out.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalAdultDermoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNevusSkin NeoplasmsYoung Adultdermatoscopydermoscopymelanomareflectance confocal microscopysimulatorSutton naevus

Identifiers

PMID32318743
PMCPMC9137359
OpenAlexW3016352261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.