Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318658›Full record

ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2020

A study of scientific publications on the greater cane rat (

Oluwaseun Ahmed Mustapha, Ebunoluwa Elizabeth Teriba, Oluwaseun Samuel Ezekiel, Ayokunle Matthew Olude, Adebayo Koyuum Akinloye, James Olukayode Olopade

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A study of scientific publications on the greater cane rat (Animal models and experimental medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oluwaseun Ahmed MustaphaDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy College of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-7379
Ebunoluwa Elizabeth TeribaDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy College of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria.
Oluwaseun Samuel EzekielDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy College of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria.
Ayokunle Matthew OludeDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy College of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria.
Adebayo Koyuum AkinloyeDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy College of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria.
James Olukayode OlopadeDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Ibadan Ibadan Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-0801
Federal University of Agriculture · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe greater cane rat (GCR), reputed to be African's second largest rodent, is a precocial hystricomorph with an uncommon phenotype and life history. Scientific and socio-economic interests in the GCR have led to heightened research efforts targeted towards a better understanding of its biology and exploration of its economic and translational usefulness.

methodsRecords of all online scientific publications on the GCR from Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, science.gov, Ebscohost and Worldwide science, with the exception of research theses, proceedings, unpublished projects and abstracts, were collated and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsA total of 146 published scholarly articles spanning about six decades were retrieved, with 98% of the GCR publications originating from African countries. Nigeria boasts the highest number of publications (58.22%) followed by Ghana (21.23%) and South Africa (5.48%) while Senegal contributed the least (0.69%). Publications were sorted into ten field categories. The field with the highest number of articles (41.78%) was animal breeding and management recording, closely followed by anatomy (37.67%). Lesser contributions were made by parasitology (5.48%), biochemistry/hematology (4.8%), pharmacology/toxicology (4.11%), pathology (2.06%), and surgery/anesthesia and physiology (1.37% apiece). The fields with fewest contributions were microbiology and developmental biology (0.69% each).

conclusionThis study chronicles the spectrum of knowledge available on the GCR, highlighting the knowledge gap that still exists in various fields in order to provide advocacy for new frontiers in research efforts on this rodent. We suggest the need for a clearly defined and well integrated national/regional policy aimed at establishing Africa's foremost micro-livestock rodent, the greater cane rat, on the world's scientific radar.

Indexed as

African rodentgrasscuttergreater cane ratmicro‐livestockreviewwildlife

Identifiers

PMID32318658
PMCPMC7167232
OpenAlexW3012842453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.