Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318535›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

Can the South African Milestones for Reducing Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Silicosis be Achieved and Reliably Monitored?

Derk H Brouwer, David Rees

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coal mining as a risk factor for tuberculosis - Commodity or circumstance?Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Silicotuberculosis: a critical narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Silicosis and silicotuberculosis: Ancient diseases that are still not conquered.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Risk of Silico-Tuberculosis in Miners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derk H BrouwerFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
David ReesFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicosis and other respirable crystalline silica-associated diseases, most notably tuberculosis, have long been substantial causes of morbidity and mortality in South Africa. For the mining and non-mining industries, silicosis elimination programmes have been developed with milestones regarding reduction of levels of exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and targets regarding the date of eradication. The present paper explores the feasibility of achieving these targets by investigating the evidence that levels of exposure and silicosis incidence rates have declined by an appraisal of the methods for data collection and reporting. In the mining industry the silicosis elimination programme is supported by the development and advocacy of leading practices to reduce the exposure. RCS exposure data are routinely collected according to a Code of Practice (CoP) and the results are reported to the Mine Health and Safety Inspectorate. As the CoP and the actual workplace practices have been demonstrated to have some flaws, there is some concern about the accuracy of the actual exposure data and the data interpretation. The annually reported levels of exposure suggest a decline, however, the actual levels of RCS as well as the number of exposed workers, were not reported over the last few years. With regard to the silicosis incidence rates, a steady decline of new cases is reported. However, there is a risk of under-diagnosis and- reporting especially in former miners. In the non-mining industries, a systematic baseline of RCS exposure levels and silicosis incidence is lacking. The reporting by industries on assigning of the workforce to exposure categories seems to be fragmented and incomplete. Consequently, any evidence of progress toward achieving the silicosis elimination target cannot be documented. Both the silicosis elimination target and the exposure milestone are aspirational but are unlikely to be achieved. Nevertheless, the formal mining industry may get close. Exposure control interventions, especially in the non-mining industries, should be developed and implemented and pragmatic methods need to be put in place to identify sources of new silicosis cases for targeted intervention.

Indexed as

MinersSilicosisHumansMiningSilicon DioxideSouth AfricaSilicon Dioxidebiasdata analysisexposure controlgroupingunder-reporting and diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32318535
PMCPMC7154115
OpenAlexW3015323212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.