Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318478›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020

Clinical profile and atypical manifestation of

Kamalraj Mohan, Jeevan Malaiyan, Sowmya Nasimuddin, Ravin Sathyaseelan Devasir, PradeepRaj Meenakshi-Sundaram, Santhiya Selvaraj, Bharathi Krishnasamy, Sumathi Gnanadesikan, Muthulakshmi Karthikeyan, Mohanakrishnan Kandasamy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dengue and Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Responses of CD27Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kamalraj MohanDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jeevan MalaiyanDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sowmya NasimuddinDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ravin Sathyaseelan DevasirDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
PradeepRaj Meenakshi-SundaramDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Santhiya SelvarajDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bharathi KrishnasamyInstitute of Microbiology, Madurai Medical College, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sumathi GnanadesikanDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Muthulakshmi KarthikeyanDepartment of Microbiology, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohanakrishnan KandasamyDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nithyalakshmi JayakumarDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dhevahi ElumalaiDepartment of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gokul G RaDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University · INMadurai Medical College · INMeenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDengue fever is a common mosquito-borne viral disease which has reached alarming size in the past few years. It is endemic in more than 100 countries and significant differences were found in clinical profile and atypical manifestation. AIM OF THE STUDY: A retrospective observational study of clinical profile and atypical manifestations in patients with dengue fever. MATERIALS AND

methodsSerum samples were collected from clinically suspected cases of dengue fever and it was confirmed by NS1 antigen, IgM, and IgG antibody by ELISA. Clinical details and atypical manifestations were recorded. OBSERVATION: During the study period, a total of 2502 patients were suspected to have dengue infection, of which 464 (18.5%) samples were found to be positive for dengue viral infection. A majority of the cases were males [268 (57%)] when compared with females [196 (42%)]. Fever was the most common clinical presentation seen in all the patients, followed by headache (78.4%), myalgia (61%), body pain (49.3%), vomiting (40%), joint pain (31.5%), dry cough (19%), nausea (14%), abdominal pain (8%), diarrhea (5.6%), retro-orbital pain (04%), burning micturition (2.4%), and rashes (0.6%). Among atypical manifestations, hepatomegaly [32 (7%)] was the most common, followed by splenomegaly [23 (5%)], bradycardia [18 (4%)], meningitis [6 (1.2%)], hemoptysis [5 (1%)], acalculous cholecystitis [4 (0.8%)], and acute pancreatitis [2 (0.4%)]. The study of hematological parameters showed thrombocytopenia was present in 179 (38.5%) patients, followed by leukopenia [77 (17%)] and raised hematocrit [29 (6.2%)].

conclusionDuring ongoing epidemics, the clinical profile and atypical manifestations in clinically suspected dengue patients should be investigated early so that severe forms can be treated promptly.

Indexed as

Atypical manifestationclinical profiledengue feverhematological parameters

Identifiers

PMID32318478
PMCPMC7113926
OpenAlexW3010491805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.