ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
Profile and outcome of patients with ground-level falls.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Pupillary Data on Presence of Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ground level falls: computed tomography findings and clinical outcomes by age groups.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023Article
- Unintentional falls among children in rural Ghana and associated factors: a cluster-randomized, population-based household survey.The Pan African medical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA ground-level fall is one of the most common modes of injury sustained across all age groups. For older adults, ground level falls can result in multiple injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective observational study included all patients presenting with fall from a ground level to our emergency department (ED) from January 2018 to December 2018. Demographics, details of incident, severity of injury, and outcome were analyzed.
resultsDuring the study period, 596 patients with a mean age of 40.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 25.9) years were included in the analysis. A quarter (23%) were aged less than 15 years, while the elderly (>60 years) comprised of 29.5%. Half the patients were triaged as priority 2 (53.8%). The lower limbs (36.6%), upper limbs (23.9%), and face (15.3%) were the body areas that were most commonly injured. The new injury severity score (NISS) was more than 8 in 28% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the elderly (>60 years) to have a higher odds (2.51 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-4.02) of sustaining a fracture of a dislocation. One fifth of the patients (120/596; 20.1%) required hospital admission with only one fatality. Fifteen patients (2.5%) left the hospital against medical advice. Two-thirds (66.3%) required only conservative management, while 19.9% required major surgical intervention.
conclusionA ground-level fall is a common mode of injury in children (<15 years) and the elderly (>60 years). The extremities and face are the most common areas of the body that are prone to injuries. Age-friendly infrastructure modifications at home, work places, and in public areas for elders and ensuring playground safety for children are the needs of the hour to decrease falls on level ground.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.