Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318285›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2020

Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control.

Laura Remón, Pablo Pérez-Merino, Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo, Ana I Amorim-de-Sousa, José M González-Méijome

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Visual Impact of Uncorrected Astigmatism in Eyes Fitted with Dual Focus Myopia Control Lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. In vivo assessment of multifocal contact lens fitting using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accommodative behaviour and retinal defocus in highly myopic eyes fitted with a dual focus myopia control contact lens.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Statistical Model of Ocular Wavefronts With Accommodation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura RemónDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3979-4528
Pablo Pérez-MerinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Biomedical Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-7567
Rute J Macedo-de-AraújoClinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Ana I Amorim-de-SousaClinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
José M González-MéijomeClinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-4170
University of Minho · PTHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifocal and multifocal optical devices are intended to get images into focus from objects placed at different distances from the observer. Spectacles, contact lenses, and intraocular lenses can meet the requirements to provide such a solution. Contact lenses provide unique characteristics as a platform for implementing bifocality and multifocality. Compared to spectacles, they are closer to the eye, providing a wider field of view, less distortion, and their use is more consistent as they are not so easily removed along the day. In addition, contact lenses are also minimally invasive, can be easily exchangeable, and, therefore, suitable for conditions in which surgical procedures are not indicated. Contact lenses can remain centered with the eye despite eye movements, providing the possibility for simultaneous imaging from different object distances. The main current indications for bifocal and multifocal contact lenses include presbyopia correction in adult population and myopia control in children. Considering the large numbers of potential candidates for optical correction of presbyopia and the demographic trends in myopia, the potential impact of contact lenses for presbyopia and myopia applications is undoubtedly tremendous. However, the ocular characteristics and expectations vary significantly between young and older candidates and impose different challenges in fitting bifocal and multifocal contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia and myopia control. This review presents the recent developments in material platforms, optical designs, simulated visual performance, and the clinical performance assessment of bifocal and multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia correction and/or myopia progression control.

Identifiers

PMID32318285
PMCPMC7152962
OpenAlexW3014273856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.