Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32318093›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

GVCHAP: A Computing Pipeline for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation Using Haplotypes and SNP Markers.

Dzianis Prakapenka, Chunkao Wang, Zuoxiang Liang, Cheng Bian, Cheng Tan, Yang Da

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genome-Wide Association Study of Fiber Diameter in Alpacas.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Digital Phenotyping: A Game Changer for the Broiler Industry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Genomic prediction with haplotype blocks in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dzianis PrakapenkaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Chunkao WangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Zuoxiang LiangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Cheng BianDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Cheng TanDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Yang DaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haplotype prediction models open many possibilities to improve the accuracy of genomic selection but require more data processing and computing time than single-SNP prediction models. To facilitate haplotype analysis for genomic prediction and estimation using structural and functional genomic information, we developed a computing pipeline to implement haplotype analysis with capabilities for preparation of input data for haplotype analysis, genomic prediction and estimation using GVCHAP, and analysis of GVCHAP results. Data preparation includes utility programs for haplotype imputing; defining haplotype blocks by a fixed number of SNPs, a fixed distance in base pairs per block, or user defined block lengths based on structural or functional genomic information or a mixture of both types of information; and defining haplotype genotypes within each haplotype block. GVCHAP is the main program for genomic prediction and estimation, calculates GREML (genomic restricted maximum likelihood) estimates of variance components and heritabilities, and calculates GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) for additive and dominance values of single SNPs as well as additive values of haplotypes with reliability estimates for training and validation populations. A two-step strategy and a method of multi-node processing are implemented to remove the computing bottleneck due to the creation of genomic relationship matrices for large samples. The analysis of GVCHAP results includes calculation of observed prediction accuracies from validation studies and preparation of input files for graphical visualization of heritability estimates of haplotype blocks as well as estimates of SNP effects and heritabilities. The entire pipeline provides an efficient and versatile computing tool for identifying the most accurate haplotype model among many candidate haplotype models utilizing structural and functional genomic information for genomic selection.

Indexed as

genomic selectionhaplotypeheritabilityprediction accuracySNP

Identifiers

PMID32318093
PMCPMC7154123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.