Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317962›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bing Li, Li Liang, Huijie Deng, Jinmin Guo, He Shu, Li Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05864716 (The Comparison of the Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05864716 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Comparison of the Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsEffect of DrugArmsColonscopic probiotics spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Altered molecular signature of the intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients versus healthy controls: An updated systematic review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing LiDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
Li LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
Huijie DengDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
Jinmin GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
He ShuDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, 960th Hospital of the PLA, Jinan, China.
82th Hospital of Pla · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrritable bowel syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal disease. Evidence has suggested that probiotics may benefit IBS symptoms. However, clinical trials remain conflicting.

aimsTo implement a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of probiotics for IBS patients.

methodsWe searched for relevant trials in Medline(1966 to Jan 2019), Embase(1974 to Jan 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(up to Jan 2019), the ClinicalTrials.gov trials register(up to Jan 2019), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(1978 to Jan 2019). Risk ratio (RR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI were calculated for continuous outcomes.

resultsA total of 59 studies, including 6,761 patients, were obtained. The RR of the improvement or response with probiotics versus placebo was 1.52 (95% CI 1.32-1.76), with significant heterogeneity (I

conclusionProbiotics are effective and safe for IBS patients. Single probiotics with a higher dose (daily dose of probiotics ≥10

Indexed as

efficacyirratable bowel syndromemeta-analysisprobioticssafety

Identifiers

PMID32317962
PMCPMC7147251
OpenAlexW3015033073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.