ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020
Assessing the Effectiveness of Automated Emotion Recognition in Adults and Children for Clinical Investigation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding Social Cues: A Scoping Review of AI-Supported Emotional Competencies and Their Impact on School-Aged Populations.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Review
- Children's affect: Automated coding, context effects, relations with maternal affect, and heritability.Child development · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal multimodal emotion recognition using Temporal video sequences and pose features for child emotion classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emotional recognition technologies applied to health: review and challenges.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025Review
- The Promises and Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in the Delivery of Behavior Analytic Services.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Physiological Noise Filtering in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals Using Wavelet Transform and Long-Short Term Memory Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The cross-race effect in automatic facial expression recognition violates measurement invariance.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Spherical Phase Space Partitioning Based Symbolic Time Series Analysis (SPSP-STSA) for Emotion Recognition Using EEG Signals.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Incorporating Interpersonal Synchronization Features for Automatic Emotion Recognition from Visual and Audio Data during Communication.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Decoding Multiple Sound-Categories in the Auditory Cortex by Neural Networks: An fNIRS Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Video Assessment to Detect Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent success stories in automated object or face recognition, partly fuelled by deep learning artificial neural network (ANN) architectures, have led to the advancement of biometric research platforms and, to some extent, the resurrection of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In line with this general trend, inter-disciplinary approaches have been taken to automate the recognition of emotions in adults or children for the benefit of various applications, such as identification of children's emotions prior to a clinical investigation. Within this context, it turns out that automating emotion recognition is far from being straightforward, with several challenges arising for both science (e.g., methodology underpinned by psychology) and technology (e.g., the iMotions biometric research platform). In this paper, we present a methodology and experiment and some interesting findings, which raise the following research questions for the recognition of emotions and attention in humans: (a) the adequacy of well-established techniques such as the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), (b) the adequacy of state-of-the-art biometric research platforms, (c) the extent to which emotional responses may be different in children and adults. Our findings and first attempts to answer some of these research questions are based on a mixed sample of adults and children who took part in the experiment, resulting in a statistical analysis of numerous variables. These are related to both automatically and interactively captured responses of participants to a sample of IAPS pictures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.