Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Modulating dream experience: Noninvasive brain stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex reduces dream movement.

Valdas Noreika, Jennifer M Windt, Markus Kern, Katja Valli, Tiina Salonen, Riitta Parkkola, Antti Revonsuo, Ahmed A Karim, Tonio Ball, Bigna Lenggenhager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A dream EEG and mentation database.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Valdas NoreikaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, United Kingdom. vn261@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-6954
Jennifer M WindtDepartment of Philosophy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Clayton, Australia.
Markus KernTranslational Neurotechnology Lab, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Katja ValliDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-8664
Tiina SalonenDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Riitta ParkkolaDepartment of Radiology, University and University Hospital of Turku, 20521, Turku, Finland.
Antti RevonsuoDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Ahmed A KarimDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-1565
Tonio BallTranslational Neurotechnology Lab, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Bigna LenggenhagerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, 8050, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-9931
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Freiburg · DEConstructor University · DEMonash University · AUTurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, cortical correlates of specific dream contents have been reported, such as the activation of the sensorimotor cortex during dreamed hand clenching. Yet, despite a close resemblance of such activation patterns to those seen during the corresponding wakeful behaviour, the causal mechanisms underlying specific dream contents remain largely elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the causal role of the sensorimotor cortex in generating movement and bodily sensations during REM sleep dreaming. Following bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or sham stimulation, guided by functional mapping of the primary motor cortex, naive participants were awakened from REM sleep and responded to a questionnaire on bodily sensations in dreams. Electromyographic (EMG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were used to quantify physiological changes during the preceding REM period. We found that tDCS, compared to sham stimulation, significantly decreased reports of dream movement, especially of repetitive actions. Other types of bodily experiences, such as tactile or vestibular sensations, were not affected by tDCS, confirming the specificity of stimulation effects to movement sensations. In addition, tDCS reduced EEG interhemispheric coherence in parietal areas and affected the phasic EMG correlation between both arms. These findings show that a complex temporal reorganization of the motor network co-occurred with the reduction of dream movement, revealing a link between central and peripheral motor processes and movement sensations of the dream self. tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex interferes with dream movement during REM sleep, which is consistent with a causal contribution to dream experience and has broader implications for understanding the neural basis of self-experience in dreams.

Indexed as

AdultDreamsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansKinesthesisMaleMental RecallPolysomnographySensorimotor CortexSleep, REMSpace PerceptionStereotaxic TechniquesSurveys and QuestionnairesTouch PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32317714
PMCPMC7174293
OpenAlexW3017176900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.