Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317640›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Genomic release-recapture experiment in the wild reveals within-generation polygenic selection in stickleback fish.

Telma G Laurentino, Dario Moser, Marius Roesti, Matthias Ammann, Anja Frey, Fabrizia Ronco, Benjamin Kueng, Daniel Berner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome evolution in an agricultural pest following adoption of transgenic crops.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fitness maps to a large-effect locus in introduced stickleback populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Telma G LaurentinoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. telma.laurentino@unibas.ch.
Dario MoserDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Marius RoestiInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-4804
Matthias AmmannDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Anja FreyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Fabrizia RoncoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1583-8108
Benjamin KuengDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel BernerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. daniel.berner@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How rapidly natural selection sorts genome-wide standing genetic variation during adaptation remains largely unstudied experimentally. Here, we present a genomic release-recapture experiment using paired threespine stickleback fish populations adapted to selectively different lake and stream habitats. First, we use pooled whole-genome sequence data from the original populations to identify hundreds of candidate genome regions likely under divergent selection between these habitats. Next, we generate F2 hybrids from the same lake-stream population pair in the laboratory and release thousands of juveniles into a natural stream habitat. Comparing the individuals surviving one year of stream selection to a reference sample of F2 hybrids allows us to detect frequency shifts across the candidate regions toward the genetic variants typical of the stream population-an experimental outcome consistent with polygenic directional selection. Our study reveals that adaptation in nature can be detected as a genome-wide signal over just a single generation.

Indexed as

GenomeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsComputational BiologyEcosystemEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetics, PopulationLakesMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRiversSelection, GeneticSmegmamorpha

Identifiers

PMID32317640
PMCPMC7174299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.