Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317605›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2020

Comparison of Immunohistochemistry for PRAME With Cytogenetic Test Results in the Evaluation of Challenging Melanocytic Tumors.

Cecilia Lezcano, Achim A Jungbluth, Klaus J Busam

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Immunohistochemistry of melanocytic tumours].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. PRAME Expression in Melanoma is Negatively Regulated by TET2-Mediated DNA Hydroxymethylation.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Shedding light on PRAME expression in dysplastic nevi: a cohort study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Refining the application of PRAME-a useful marker in high CSD and acral melanoma subtypes.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecilia LezcanoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY.
Achim A Jungbluth
Klaus J Busam
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a melanoma-associated antigen. Although diffuse immunoreactivity for PRAME is found in most primary cutaneous melanomas, melanocytic nevi express PRAME usually only in a subpopulation of tumor cells or not at all. Hence, testing for PRAME expression has the potential to provide useful information for the assessment for diagnostically ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms. Many of the latter tumors are currently studied by cytogenetic methods for ancillary evidence in support of or against a diagnosis of melanoma. In this study we analyzed 110 diagnostically problematic melanocytic tumors comparing results for PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) with those from fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or single nucleotide polymorphism-array, and each with the final diagnostic interpretation. In 90% of cases there was concordance between PRAME IHC and cytogenetic tests results, and in 92.7% concordance between PRAME IHC and the final diagnosis. The high concordance between PRAME IHC and cytogenetic test results as well as the final diagnosis supports the use of PRAME IHC as an ancillary test in the evaluation of ambiguous primary cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms, especially given its practical advantage of lower cost and faster turnaround over cytogenetic or gene expression studies. However, our results indicate that PRAME IHC and cytogenetic tests for melanocytic tumors are not entirely interchangeable and on occasion each type of test may yield false-negative or false-positive results.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCytogenetic AnalysisImmunohistochemistryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorPRAME protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32317605
PMCPMC7289661
OpenAlexW3016766334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.