Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317381›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Optimizing

Marcela A Mendoza-Suárez, Barney A Geddes, Carmen Sánchez-Cañizares, Ricardo H Ramírez-González, Charlotte Kirchhelle, Beatriz Jorrin, Philip S Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. An overview ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcela A Mendoza-SuárezDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-1362
Barney A GeddesDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-2083
Carmen Sánchez-CañizaresDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-5274
Ricardo H Ramírez-GonzálezJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, NR4 7UH Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-7085
Charlotte KirchhelleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8448-6906
Beatriz JorrinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6198-0925
Philip S PooleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom; philip.poole@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-6455

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L011484/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N003608/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N013387/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001801/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legumes tend to be nodulated by competitive rhizobia that do not maximize nitrogen (N

Indexed as

FabaceaeGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNitrogenNitrogen FixationPisum sativumPlasmidsRhizobium leguminosarumRoot Nodules, PlantSoil MicrobiologySymbiosisSynthetic BiologyGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNitrogencompetitionlegumenitrogen-fixingnodulationrhizobium

Identifiers

PMID32317381
PMCPMC7211974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.