ArticleeNeuro
Feedback Adaptation to Unpredictable Force Fields in 250 ms.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- Fast learning without synaptic plasticity in spiking neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advanced feedback enhances sensorimotor adaptation.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- The nervous system tunes sensorimotor gains when reaching in variable mechanical environments.iScience · 2023Article
- Pupil diameter tracked during motor adaptation in humans.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Separability of Human Motor Memories during reaching adaptation with force cues.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Heksor: the central nervous system substrate of an adaptive behaviour.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- Adaptive Feedback Control in Human Reaching Adaptation to Force Fields.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Individual Differences in Sensorimotor Adaptation Are Conserved Over Time and Across Force-Field Tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Time course of changes in the long-latency feedback response parallels the fast process of short-term motor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor learning and adaptation are important functions of the nervous system. Classical studies have characterized how humans adapt to changes in the environment during tasks such as reaching, and have documented improvements in behavior across movements. However, little is known about how quickly the nervous system adapts to such disturbances. In particular, recent work has suggested that adaptation could be sufficiently fast to alter the control strategies of an ongoing movement. To further address the possibility that learning occurred within a single movement, we designed a series of human reaching experiments to extract from muscles recordings the latency of feedback adaptation. Our results confirmed that participants adapted their feedback responses to unanticipated force fields applied randomly. In addition, our analyses revealed that the feedback response was specifically and finely tuned to the ongoing perturbation not only across trials with the same force field, but also across different kinds of force fields. Finally, changes in muscle activity consistent with feedback adaptation occurred in ∼250 ms following reach onset. The adaptation that we observed across trials presented in a random context was similar to the one observed when the force fields could be anticipated, suggesting that these two adaptive processes may be closely linked to each other. In such case, our measurement of 250 ms may correspond to the latency of motor adaptation in the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.