Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317344›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Feedback Adaptation to Unpredictable Force Fields in 250 ms.

Frédéric Crevecoeur, James Mathew, Marie Bastin, Philippe Lefèvre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frédéric CrevecoeurInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium frederic.crevecoeur@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-1153
James MathewInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.
Marie BastinDNAlytics, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.
Philippe LefèvreInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-3635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor learning and adaptation are important functions of the nervous system. Classical studies have characterized how humans adapt to changes in the environment during tasks such as reaching, and have documented improvements in behavior across movements. However, little is known about how quickly the nervous system adapts to such disturbances. In particular, recent work has suggested that adaptation could be sufficiently fast to alter the control strategies of an ongoing movement. To further address the possibility that learning occurred within a single movement, we designed a series of human reaching experiments to extract from muscles recordings the latency of feedback adaptation. Our results confirmed that participants adapted their feedback responses to unanticipated force fields applied randomly. In addition, our analyses revealed that the feedback response was specifically and finely tuned to the ongoing perturbation not only across trials with the same force field, but also across different kinds of force fields. Finally, changes in muscle activity consistent with feedback adaptation occurred in ∼250 ms following reach onset. The adaptation that we observed across trials presented in a random context was similar to the one observed when the force fields could be anticipated, suggesting that these two adaptive processes may be closely linked to each other. In such case, our measurement of 250 ms may correspond to the latency of motor adaptation in the nervous system.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalPsychomotor PerformanceFeedbackHumansLearningMovementadaptive controlfeedback controlmotor adaptationreaching

Identifiers

PMID32317344
PMCPMC7196721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.